New Everton Owners: The Friedkin Group

What do we reckon?

  • 👍

    Votes: 904 71.1%
  • 🤷 | 🧀🥪

    Votes: 308 24.2%
  • 👎

    Votes: 60 4.7%

  • Total voters
    1,272



1000077413.gif
 
Can anybody explain that in lay mans terms and say what (if any) effect it has on the takeover.
It means that any deal between Friedkin and A-Cap to settle/partially settle the debt on takeover remains uncertain on outcome as the court has refused to provide any indication so far on whether it would approve ie refusing to take sides between A-Cap and Leadenhall as to who Friedkins should pay at this stage.

This means Friedkin, A-Cap, Leadenhall either have to reach a negotiated agreement between all parties fast to jointly seek court approval (which you would expect to be granted) or A-Cap/Leadenhall persist with the legal stand-off meaning Friedkin has to either walk away again or proceed with the takeover with the counter-party ownership and repayment schedule for this £200+m debt still unresolved.
 
It means that any deal between Friedkin and A-Cap to settle/partially settle the debt on takeover remains uncertain on outcome as the court has refused to provide any indication so far on whether it would approve ie refusing to take sides between A-Cap and Leadenhall as to who Friedkins should pay at this stage.

This means Friedkin, A-Cap, Leadenhall either have to reach a negotiated agreement between all parties fast to jointly seek court approval (which you would expect to be granted) or A-Cap/Leadenhall persist with the legal stand-off meaning Friedkin has to either walk away again or proceed with the takeover with the counter-party ownership and repayment schedule for this £200+m debt still unresolved.
If he walks away again I swear to god :lol:
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top