Oh dear - this is going to hurt someone, somewhere.I've barely dipped my toe myself mate.
View attachment 35234
Been a v busy boy. Got a quiet week coming up though so may have a little bash......
* flexes thumb for possible retaliatory action
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh dear - this is going to hurt someone, somewhere.I've barely dipped my toe myself mate.
View attachment 35234
Been a v busy boy. Got a quiet week coming up though so may have a little bash......
Sorry mate, you're miles out on this.
60K stadium, 5.7k of which hospitality at 200 ex VAT per match, 10 boxes of 30 @75k ex vat per season, 2.5k away supporters at 25 ex vat 39k season tickets at an average of 285 ex vat per season and 12.5k walk ips at an average of 32.50p ex vat gives a bums on seats take of 43.931 m at 100% occupancy, 42.4m at 95% and 40.874 at 90% for a 60k ground. This is 19 PL matches only.
Compare this with the current amount of about 17m before the price reductions last year so up 23 mil on 90%.
If financing were required on 200m at 7% over 20 years, this would cost 18.6m per year and replaces the former 2.8 mil to Pru Trustees, so increased negative cashflow of 15.8
23 -15.8 = 7.2, so that's the wriggle room for increased costs.
Bear in mind, this is matchday seat/hospitality income only. Booze/pies/coffees not included.
Not you mate. Wouldn't dream of it.Oh dear - this is going to hurt someone, somewhere.
* flexes thumb for possible retaliatory action
The only cavaet on the bright future is if an underwritten rights issue were done at 5k per share, BHHL has already paid 80mil of the 175mil paid if debt is changed for equity. This rights issue would probably incur costs as well, so if done would raise 95mil less costs presumably for stadium funding (or lawnmowers!).
Haha or Blue gravel.The only cavaet on the bright future is if an underwritten rights issue were done at 5k per share, BHHL has already paid 80mil of the 175mil paid if debt is changed for equity. This rights issue would probably incur costs as well, so if done would raise 95mil less costs presumably for stadium funding (or lawnmowers!).
It justs looks detailed cos I've tried to explain a spreadsheet in text mate.Yes - agreed! Fully agree with all those figures there.
(Note to self - don't crack on that you only got grade 2 CSE maths and all that algebra trigonometry stuff up there that Hibbo's done might as well be written in Mandarin)
Totally agree mate, was just trying to head off the fume when (if) a rights issue doesn't bring in what's expected.Unlike with previous failed ground moves we've got a businessman of the highest order driving the scheme forward. The circles he operates in are at the very top of the tree when it comes to the elite money men. He knows what he wants and almost always he and his business partners get what they want.
...with evil intentNot you mate. Wouldn't dream of it.
*looks to the spud munchers....
Revenge is a dish best served right up him. Deep relentless penetration is the way to go....with evil intent
Revenge is a dish best served right up him. Deep relentless penetration is the way to go.
As with USM Finch Farm (that no one seen coming) I think Moshiri & his team will have something in the pipeline. If this offsets the borrowing its a massive gamechanger for the club.
I think & hope we'll all be pleasantly surprised.
Sorry mate, you're miles out on this.
60K stadium, 5.7k of which hospitality at 200 ex VAT per match, 10 boxes of 30 @75k ex vat per season, 2.5k away supporters at 25 ex vat 39k season tickets at an average of 285 ex vat per season and 12.5k walk ips at an average of 32.50p ex vat gives a bums on seats take of 43.931 m at 100% occupancy, 42.4m at 95% and 40.874 at 90% for a 60k ground. This is 19 PL matches only.
Compare this with the current amount of about 17m before the price reductions last year so up 23 mil on 90%.
If financing were required on 200m at 7% over 20 years, this would cost 18.6m per year and replaces the former 2.8 mil to Pru Trustees, so increased negative cashflow of 15.8
23 -15.8 = 7.2, so that's the wriggle room for increased costs.
Bear in mind, this is matchday seat/hospitality income only. Booze/pies/coffees not included.
I worked off the Esks breakdowns using 90% occupancy for only the non season long sales as the variable which you have never corrected.Sorry mate, I'm not. I saw the plans produced by Everton for both KD & Kirkby. I also have a pretty accurate breakdown of our current ticket revenue and pushing half our tickets sold are discounted (young, old, students etc.). If we average around 50k we will increase turnover by about £10m if have 3k hospitality at a 20% mark-up to current prices for better facilites & assuming a similar range of varying quality lounge packages. To be clear neither previous plan had more than 3k exec provision. If you also assume no increase in % subsidised tickets or in our base ticket prices. We are not in London. To expand capacity we will keep prices down. They are not going to be assuming a £25m uplift in match day revenue n their plans.
I'm also a properly qualified Finance professional with 30 years experience if you want to carry on the argument. I'll happily do an Elstone and show you the spreadsheets