Koeman also said mirralas has agreed terms? And?he also said mirallas was signing a new contract 2 days ago. oh and goodison wouldnt get a safety certificate
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Koeman also said mirralas has agreed terms? And?he also said mirallas was signing a new contract 2 days ago. oh and goodison wouldnt get a safety certificate
Koeman also said mirralas has agreed terms? And?
But its not going to be a 50,000 seater.
Kenright said that he has been convinced by the advantages of a standing section. If we can get just one side
a standing terrace then the capacity should exceed Anfield - and that is crucial - without much difficulty.
I believe there is a standing system that does meet the safety requirements in England already.Not sure how simple it'll be to get Parliament to back the change which will bring in safe-standing in England. Wouldn't put all your eggs into that basket. Obviously future-proof the design to allow for it but I would think the capacity needs to be of a decent size without safe-standing.
In a way, yes.
But we have a world heritage site here and the pressure is surely on to make this stadium state of the art and a big aesthetic statement to the world?
I just hope the club dont think that the location is the big deal and then place a perfunctory stadium in it.
Arsenal capital assets would be greater than ours, turnover, land value overall assets plc a lot higher than oursHow do you know the interest rate will be far more? You don't know anything more than anyone else
How do you know the interest rate will be far more? You don't know anything more than anyone else
How much will it take to give us an icon though Crusty?I've also been pondering this scenario since March. It wouldn't surprise if the club were using the brownie points and goodwill gained by obtaining the Bramley Moore location to compensate for a cheap stadium. £300 million is not going to be enough to build an iconic stadium.
I've also been pondering this scenario since March. It wouldn't surprise if the club were using the brownie points and goodwill gained by obtaining the Bramley Moore location to compensate for a cheap stadium. £300 million is not going to be enough to build an iconic stadium.
I thought $300M was just the loan, not the cost of the stadium. Won't there be additional funding through naming rights, etc?
As far as I know successful businessmen do not generally use their own personal wealth to fund their companies they use their wealth underwrite loans . I believe this was effectively themethod John Moores used to great effect.Arsenal capital assets would be greater than ours, turnover, land value overall assets plc a lot higher than ours
Loan to value less risk as assets outweigh debts ...... then again I may be wrong and its only my opinion
I am assuming a more favourable rate for us as the Council are standing as guarantor. The figures that we are giving them for doing so over 40 year are to me `astronomical`, hence why I would suspect any prudent business would want to pay this debt down sooner rather than later. I struggle to see any benefit of this funding model based upon the limited information available so far.
If we have a billionaire owner bought in at 49% I do not understand the funding model. Common sense dictates with no debt we are worth more
why straddle us with a huge debt for 40 years ?