Anything to back that claim up? Starting from a dock filled with water it's quite a statement.
Apparently 20k seats cost 600m according to him yet a circa 55k stadium we have a ballpark figure of 500m
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anything to back that claim up? Starting from a dock filled with water it's quite a statement.
A 45k Stadium would cost around half the cost of a 60k Stadium.
Anything to back that claim up? Starting from a dock filled with water it's quite a statement.
Apparently 20k seats cost 600m according to him yet a circa 55k stadium we have a ballpark figure of 500m
Have a think about the location of those extra seats. Up in the Gods and what you have to build underneath to support them. Have a think about how poor the view will be and how much of a discount you will have to offer to fill them week in week out. Then think about how much of a drag on the Clubs finances those seats will be if you don't fill them.
We already have 40,157 seats so to get to 60k we would have to spend £600m. So that £600m gets us an extra 19,843.
No we can't. Everyone in the Premier League gets the TV money. What differentiates the top Clubs from the bottom Clubs is the rest of your income. United and Arsenal for instance have match day incomes of around £100m. Spurs, Chelsea and Liverpool will in the near future meet or surpass those kind of figures. They earn huge amounts from ticket prices AND make money from retail/hospitality.
Then there is the cost of actually paying for the Stadium. If you add 20,000 seats for say £600m then that money needs to repaid.
A new Stadium only makes sense if it increases our income and allows us to compete because under FFP and the Premier League fair play rules Moshiri can only bankroll us for so long.
BMD can't simply be a vanity project it needs to make financial sense. At the moment we should forget about looking to one up the RS and look at what makes financial sense for Everton. That means upping our revenue per seat and adding Corporate/Hospitality facilities. We need a Stadium that we can fill week in week out and a Stadium that allows us to charge higher prices.
There is no such thing as a free lunch. The priority has to be the team and being successful. A state of the art scaleable Stadium with great facilities that holds 45-50k makes far more sense. It will mean lower repayments meaning more can be spent on players. It will mean we can drive up revenue per seat which is crucial and it will be far less risky.
Build the fan base, improve the team, increase revenues and expand the Stadium as we grow. It might not be sexy but it worked for United and it can work for us.
erm no that 600m gets us a new stadiumWe already have 40,157 seats so to get to 60k we would have to spend £600m. So that £600m gets us an extra 19,843.
erm no that 600m gets us a new stadium
That is the most bizarre way I have ever seen anyone post about the cost of a stadium.
Have a think about the location of those extra seats. Up in the Gods and what you have to build underneath to support them. Have a think about how poor the view will be and how much of a discount you will have to offer to fill them week in week out. Then think about how much of a drag on the Clubs finances those seats will be if you don't fill them.
Hot half!
A 45k Stadium would cost around half the cost of a 60k Stadium. We could still have the same amount of hospitality/corporate facilities. The debt repayments would be much lower there would be far less risk, we could invest more in the team and the biggest kicker is the push for safe standing. With safe standing you get a 60k Stadium for the price of a 45k Stadium, you can charge lower prices and you get a better atmosphere.
As we improve we can add on more capacity as we need it. Currently under 11s pay £5 a game, 11-17 year olds pay £8 a game, 17-21's pay £16 a game, 22-24's and over 65's pay £20 a game. Full price season tickets start at £23 a game. Those figures simply don't pay for a £600m Stadium.
The new Zenit Stadum looks good, 67,000 with a retractable roof. Something like this but with a single tier stand behind one goal would do us, probably out of our price range though.
Safe standing isn't even close to being approved in the PL so it's a none issue for me
I think 'safe sanding' / rail seating has to have a 1 to 1 ratio with regular seats (as they must be able to convert to seating for UEFA games), so a standing area wouldn't increase the capacity at allNo idea me, but does it allow for a massive rise in folk who can fit into the same stand that has seats?