Gardocki
Player Valuation: £8m
I've always found this strange too. It's pretty clear from other examples that the front 5-10 rows often aren't really protected from the rain, so why only bring the roof to the front of the stand?Not sure how many corporates would expect to get wet inside a new stadium, even at NFL games. They are usually set back, elevated and well-covered. It is probably the reason so many corporate seats are often empty at Wembley's half-way line.
Standing in the rain for a couple of hrs isn't great. Lots of old pics of the Gwladys St front section, the old Goodison Rd Enclosure (pre 1970s) and Paddock (pre-60s) deserted during a heavy downfall, as everyone crushed under the stands. However, sitting in the rain is abysmal and at £750m, shouldn't really be happening. Going the match shouldn't be an endurance test (Or at least no more than it already is watching us). Certainly not at the ticket prices.
This has been a recurring theme at many new grounds/stands due to the much higher rooflines, particularly with upturned roof profiles. Ponchos are offered at several. At the height of BMD's roof, these should have been at least extended to be directly above the touch/goal lines.... preferably even further infield. There is no interference with play at those heights, and natural light levels can also be maintained.
Bilbao were forced into addressing the issue at their waterfront stadium when fans in the lower tier regularly left ther seats en masse during downpours. Be interesting to see how the well-healed occupants of the West stand lower react.
If I could ask Dan Meis two questions, that would be the first. The second would be to ask the reason why the upper concourse on the south stand reduced to a pretty low height at by the windows. Surely this reduces the impact and benefit of the views for people inside and the view is meant to be one of the big 'selling points'.