Pearson
Except you said to bring him in on a short term contract, so your saying the club panics the players by bringing in a manager who they dont want so they play well so he leaves, alternatively ofc they play crap the club goes down and they all leave anyway, great thinking mate
Allardyce is the biggest myth out there, every club he has been at has gotten worse after he left than before he arrived, Newcastle actually where wrecked by him and Walsh within 6 months
I’ve no problem with Allardyce I’d prefer him over Dyche.
My reasoning is this:
It’s clear the market is limited at the moment and a long term appointment for what’s available feels wrong and to be frank risky.
He has a track record of getting the best out of what’s available.
Premier League expiernce, never been relegated.
He knows how to balance a squad both at the moment and pragmatic purchases in January. He has an eye for a The right player and getting a blend.
An Allerdyce short term appointment, also maximisises and enables the next choice after him being better.
Except you said to bring him in on a short term contract, so your saying the club panics the players by bringing in a manager who they dont want so they play well so he leaves, alternatively ofc they play crap the club goes down and they all leave anyway, great thinking mate
Allardyce is the biggest myth out there, every club he has been at has gotten worse after he left than before he arrived, Newcastle actually where wrecked by him and Walsh within 6 months
Newcastle - He had them midtable after selling two key players. Ashley just took over and bowed to the Fat Geordie biffs who hated Big Sam's football. Who'd they get in afterwards? Kevin Keagan. Joe Kinnear. Alan Shearer. Chris Hughton (1st job).
Blackburn - Again comfortably midtable. Sold big players. Didn't spend much. Venkys come in, want Champos league football with a fiver and didn't realise there was relegation - sacked him. Brought in? Steve Kean. Henning Berg. Gary Bowyer.
West Ham - Well documented. Got them promoted, finished 10th the next season. Then the Hammers faithful turned on him and wanted to bring the "West Ham way" back (whatever that is) and got above their station thinking they deserved more. Got Bilic in. One season wonder.
So...I can't see anything there that's his fault.
All together nowIt is but still no to Big Sam. Never to big Sam.
We are when we repeat our mistakes.
Once we'd dropped the under-performing players like Williams , Mirallas, Schneiderlin, and then finally took off Siggurdson, that side looked alright by the end. Certainly good enough to beat every bottom half team at home for the rest of this season and sneak a couple of away wins.
No need to give up and surrender to that big corrupt sweat Allardyce.
The problem is Allardyce is well aware of this, and will not want to be used as a pawn in a bigger game.
I'd also say, our standard in the game will fall so dramatically if we turn to Allardyce, we can really wave goodbye to top managers going forward.
As my post above says even in a best case scenario of him being here 6 months he can do huge damage by taking key decisions to move people on.
The debate reminds me a lot of the Martina debate. There was a lot of "oh he's just back up" to "oh he's only starting the odd game" to "Well he puts a decent ball in" when he is the first choice defender for a side with the worst defensive record in the league, a disproportionate amount of goals coming directly down his side. The Allardyce option and standards will slip one day to the next.