Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's been a great player, striker and captain for you, but personally it's a no-brainer for all sides. He gets to (likely) win a league, challenge for CL and have a change.18 years a Spur
So long Harry and good luck.
He's been a great player, striker and captain for you, but personally it's a no-brainer for all sides. He gets to (likely) win a league, challenge for CL and have a change.
Yes you're losing your talisman and it's late in the window, but he's heading towards his twilight years and you're getting big bucks.
What's the view on how they'll go about replacing him? Will it be done this summer - to my knowledge, I've not seen replacements mentioned - or later on?Agreed. Levy was never going to let him go for nothing next season.
£86 million for a 30yr old with 12 months left on his contract with the potential for £104mn had to be done unfortunately.
I watched him playing away at Dagenham for the youth team all the way to a CL final. It's been a great journey.
I accepted he was going to BM back in June when I posted it on here so I'm not overly emotional about it. I'm old enough to have seen Greaves leave. That was far worse to me.
Bloody hell, the Coutinho money really is a bottomless pit
What's the view on how they'll go about replacing him? Will it be done this summer - to my knowledge, I've not seen replacements mentioned - or later on?
Do you think the whole court case fiasco may mean they'll be prudent or will they run the club as a complete separate entity, as they suggested?
I read that Richarlison has been injured, so I took it as Son leading the line.
But do you honestly see Haaland staying at City long term? I don't. It wouldn't surprise me if City let Haaland go to Madrid next season ( imagine him and Mbappe) and replaced him with Kane on a free . That way Kane gets to break his precious record and win every domestic trophy. It also allows Mrs K to bring up the new kid in this country ( if that's important to them ?)
But they "can't compete with Man City,s wealth and everyone should be thankful that they have competed with them on the field over 5 years to make the premier league interesting ".The price you pay for a failed season these days. 200m on a new midfield. What chance do other clubs have?
The court case is irrelevant regarding Spurs.
We signed that young Argentinian striker but doubt if that is a Kane replacement.
I think Richarlison is injured (again) I believe. I don't remember him being made of glass at EFC?
We need at least one more CH and now a proper striker but Levy probably think he has done enough in this window already.
First impressions of our new keeper don't fill me with confidence but he may just need a bit of time to settle.
He played his entire last season juiced to the gills on painkillers to keep us upThe court case is irrelevant regarding Spurs.
We signed that young Argentinian striker but doubt if that is a Kane replacement.
I think Richarlison is injured (again) I believe. I don't remember him being made of glass at EFC?
We need at least one more CH and now a proper striker but Levy probably think he has done enough in this window already.
First impressions of our new keeper don't fill me with confidence but he may just need a bit of time to settle.
Agreed. Levy was never going to let him go for nothing next season.
£86 million for a 30yr old with 12 months left on his contract with the potential for £104mn had to be done unfortunately.
I watched him playing away at Dagenham for the youth team all the way to a CL final. It's been a great journey.
I accepted he was going to BM back in June when I posted it on here so I'm not overly emotional about it. I'm old enough to have seen Greaves leave. That was far worse to me.
He played through some injuries in his final season here, and he also had no preseason straight after the Coppa AmericaThat's all guess work though isn't it? Was rumours Levy would want to extend his contract another year to make money off him rather than let him go on a free.
And would you rather he left on a free or bank £100mill? As a club you'd take the money. As a spurs fan you gonna be happy that Kane left on a free then broke the record for another club? Spurs win the "he was one of ours" trophy and that's it.
And City aren't going to bring in a 31 year old Harry Kane. They've proved in the past they don't need a striker to win titles.
End of the day, Levy won't sell him to a premiership club. Kane shouldn't be doing that club and the owner any favours.