GP_Monty
Player Valuation: £8m
At times yes, but they will play him, havertz and Rice together in a 3.
You need more than 1 good player in a position to win....look at City.
1 would be a start for us
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At times yes, but they will play him, havertz and Rice together in a 3.
You need more than 1 good player in a position to win....look at City.
So true mate.1 would be a start for us
1 would be a start for us
I agree mate, the ffp rules are a load of hosremuck anyway. I don’t mind Todd or any club finding even dodgier ways of getting around the nonsense. Typical of Everton to not be smart enough - world class chairman and board for you.To be fair, i don't blame them for doing what they are doing.
They have found a loop hole or a gap in the laws that they are taking advantage of!
I'd love for us to of been that clever in terms of Usmanov buying up a couple of Russian sides and buying Cenk Tosun off us for £50m.
You have to blame the law makers and the PL for not keeping tabs on these sort of things
Any examples of this? Chelsea have bought lots of players but they are not trying to stockpile them, they are trying their best to offload as many as they can. Other than that, every other team in the PL has weak positions, City with the fewest as they are great in midfield and up front but at the back they have a few weaknesses and older players that could do with some succession planningRight now the top six/ seven super league teams are just playing monopoly, buying up and stock piling all the cream of the crop. The other 13/14 teams are just waiting for ghem to spend up which is near impossible and then their strategy is just to survive.
You're joking surely? We get beaten with that stick every single day. It was brought up in the build up and aftermath of us winning the Prem, the FA cup and the chumps league. It was even mention by some obsessed shills whilst the victory parade was going on. As for the accusations from the FA. If they were confident they would have punished us already and not passed in on for someone else to do. The charges are utter nonsense that were rushed in at the behest of our rivals in the vain attempt at fending off a govt regulator, with the added benefit of damaging our reputation. They have no more evidence than uefa had, cut and pasted doctored e-mails.I agree mate, the ffp rules are a load of hosremuck anyway. I don’t mind Todd or any club finding even dodgier ways of getting around the nonsense. Typical of Everton to not be smart enough - world class chairman and board for you.
It’s the continued chasing of our 1 breach that bothers me, in the press and by the league and other clubs, when all this is going on and city are still sitting there with their multiple breaches and no one is saying jack - that’s my issue.
maybe you do get mentioned more than I give credit for, but I see little old Everton with our one charge getting lit up equally as much as you guys do with your magnitude or breaches - that’s my issue.You're joking surely? We get beaten with that stick every single day. It was brought up in the build up and aftermath of us winning the Prem, the FA cup and the chumps league. It was even mention by some obsessed shills whilst the victory parade was going on. As for the accusations from the FA. If they were confident they would have punished us already and not passed in on for someone else to do. The charges are utter nonsense that were rushed in at the behest of our rivals in the vain attempt at fending off a govt regulator, with the added benefit of damaging our reputation. They have no more evidence than uefa had, cut and pasted doctored e-mails.
Any examples of this? Chelsea have bought lots of players but they are not trying to stockpile them, they are trying their best to offload as many as they can. Other than that, every other team in the PL has weak positions, City with the fewest as they are great in midfield and up front but at the back they have a few weaknesses and older players that could do with some succession planning
Chelsea weren't trying to stockpile youth players. They were buying as many as they could, sending them out on loan to try and increase their value and then sell them to another club. That is not stockpiling players so other clubs can't get them. That is buying players to try and make a profitChelsea not trying to stockpile players ? What planet have you been on mate, Chelsea have stockpiled players for years. At one time they had 30 odd players on loan at various European clubs, tbh that's a terrible example you've given me. Chelsea bought over £600m pound worth of players the last couple of years alone, that why there is a Chelsea ffp fire sale. If you look at Skysports news, Man United are after Mount, Arsenal are after Declan Rice and Havertz, Man City have bought Kovacic from Chelsea, Liverpool have bought Macallister. And believe me that's just the start. Honestly tell me could Aston Villa afford to buy any of them players mentioned, fees add wages are astronomical for the likes of the 13 clubs below our top 6/ 7 darlings.
Chelsea weren't trying to stockpile youth players. They were buying as many as they could, sending them out on loan to try and increase their value and then sell them to another club. That is not stockpiling players so other clubs can't get them. That is buying players to try and make a profit
To be fair don’t Chelsea perpetually have about 20 players out on loan?Any examples of this? Chelsea have bought lots of players but they are not trying to stockpile them, they are trying their best to offload as many as they can. Other than that, every other team in the PL has weak positions, City with the fewest as they are great in midfield and up front but at the back they have a few weaknesses and older players that could do with some succession planning
Tonali for £60 million and £250k a week - Wow.
He is some player, but Italian players dont tend to travel well...always have the exceptions to that, but in general they are more of a risk.