2017/18 Oumar Niasse

Status
Not open for further replies.

So I've just read that the referee watched it again and confirmed he still deemed there was enough contact for a pen? So I'm assuming then he should receive a 2 game ban if they'v gone over his head as they are going against his ruling, therefore restricting him and how he referees the game.

So is he banned this weekend or refereeing?
 
So I've just read that the referee watched it again and confirmed he still deemed there was enough contact for a pen?
Unsworth said this in his presser today. He said the referee had reviewed all the video evidence of the incident after the game and maintained that he had made the right decision. So his decision is being over-ruled by overpaid TV pundits with their own agendas.
 

Unsworth said this in his presser today. He said the referee had reviewed all the video evidence of the incident after the game and maintained that he had made the right decision. So his decision is being over-ruled by overpaid TV pundits with their own agendas.

Me, I am just waiting for an Arsenal jobbo goes before this committee and then see Wenger's face.
 
Unsworth said this in his presser today. He said the referee had reviewed all the video evidence of the incident after the game and maintained that he had made the right decision. So his decision is being over-ruled by overpaid TV pundits with their own agendas.
we should open a can of worms and take the matter to the european court of sports arbritation and make the fa beg for forgiveness
 

Just saw highlights of the WHU v Leic game.
So if a player gets slight contact and goes over (he dived) but, the ref isn't fooled by it, does that mean he doesn't get a ban and why didn't he get a yellow card?
 
Just saw highlights of the WHU v Leic game.
So if a player gets slight contact and goes over (he dived) but, the ref isn't fooled by it, does that mean he doesn't get a ban and why didn't he get a yellow card?
I watched the match and a commentator's point was that if a player goes down and it is shown that there was no contact, he
can't be charged with diving if there was no penalty/free kick given or a sending off. I don't know if that's a correct interpretation but it makes a farce of the whole scenario and needs to be cleared up.
 
I watched the match and a commentator's point was that if a player goes down and it is shown that there was no contact, he
can't be charged with diving if there was no penalty/free kick given or a sending off. I don't know if that's a correct interpretation but it makes a farce of the whole scenario and needs to be cleared up.

I don't understand it all now because players have, in previous seasons, been booked for 'simulation' (is that a thing anymore?).
You're right, it is a farce.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top