In a word, yes.But he's 32. Even if we don't "do a Distin", he's still got 2 years at the very top left at least. Look at John Terry, playing out of his skin at 34. There are far more pressing issues which need financial focus than replacing our form player of the last 4 months.
What's more confusing is that you want to replace him with another "bruiser" rather than a ball player. So you want to replace Jagielka with another Jagielka?
It's a crying shame that you can't even admit how good he's been both for the entire or last season, and since Christmas of this. Look at his partnership with Stones. Is that all of stones doing?
Credit where credits due, for Christ sake .
It is no coincidence that Jagielka's recent upturn in form - and it IS recent, because he was par tosh from August until February - has come at exactly the same time that Stones has settled into a prolonged run of games.
Credit where credit is due, indeed.