So, because you disagree with me it's a strawman argument? How arrogant. As is your assertion that the only reason I don't want him is because he managed the RS. I have already said I would have had Rodgers in charge. I could say that the only reason you want him is because he managed the RS. That would be a stupid thing to say as I have no clue as to your motivations, just as you have no clue about mine. You don't agree with my argument that he is past it. That's fine. I don't agree with your arguments that he is an elite manager. We'll find out soon enough who is right.
It's not arrogant at all. And it's not because I disagree with it that it becomes a strawman argument. It's a strawman argument when people say he's too old, out of touch, the game has past him by, etc, when he has been involved in the game practically the entire time, and several of his peers are older than him. It's perfectly fine if people don't like him, but it's the dinosaur argument, that he's somehow too old to do the job when Ancelotti, Rangnick, Favre, etc, his predecessor who has taken over at Real Madrid and 2 of the fan favourites to replace him, are all older, as well as Ranieri and Low who were also mentioned. Meanwhile, there's some of the same people arguing against the likes of Ferguson, Arteta, etc, because they don't have enough experience.
It's either important or its not. It doesn't become less important the more you have.
The crux of the matter is, even people who don't think he's good enough, despite building a reasonably successful career by most people's standards, they are prejudiced against him for his association with Liverpool. Which again, is fair enough. But be honest about it.
Bringing up Newcastle and China as examples of failures are unfair, because what those teams were hoping of achieving at that time, he may well have delivered. There is a difference between fans expectations of success and the targets that are assigned by owners, and they can be and often will be vastly different.
So yes, time will tell if he's successful here. And if he is, a large majority still won't be happy about it.