I can answer it right now. Yes, we'd be doing alot better if we hadn't had these injuries. Our form prior to this spate was fine, more than fine.
So then how can you justify sacking a manager who has had to deal with both these injuries and not given any investment into the team, a team that has had to literally go into damage limitation because of past mistakes?
That is why it is only a question i am asking. If benitez loses the next 5-6 games (given who some of them are) without his striker, half of his midfield, with only half a defence to begin with given the lack of back up, how can the club justify that? the fans can, its benitez, that will never go away without a trophy. Benitez was meant to be the solution on his hiring.
there isn't an easy answer to where we are now and certainly if we beat watford and wolves, none of this conversation would be in crisis mode, as some people are in currently. Benitez would have us joint 3rd and would be over achieving with the players he has.
So the other question i have, its not who else could do a better job, its what other manager could win with a team including centre halves at full back ,tom davies/ gbamin/delph as 3 of your midfield options and rondon as your striker, with bargain basement wingers plugging a gap? We are one or two injuries away from this team
Pickford
Holgate, Keane, Mina, Godfrey
Davies Gbamin/Delph
Townsend Gray Iwobi
Rondon
Or is that a team that would be in a relegation battle, given the names who are off that team, players that had us winning.