The thing about football is the perception of the quality is often just shaped by results. During the peak Moyes years 2007-12 we played some brilliant passing football. Inverted wingers, overlapping fullbacks, false 9s, whatever hipster tactical term people throw out now we were doing it.
Howard just rolled it out to Lescott or Baines and we were away with unbelievable combination play between Pienaar Osman Arteta Baines Yakubu etc. Some of the goals in that period are out of this world combination moves. We didn’t have a target man or anyone with height at that point, and even when Fellaini played we were getting it into his feet and chest to control. Despite this thought we just got given the ‘direct long ball’ tag by the media no matter what.
Meanwhile Chelsea and Liverpool under Mourinho and Benitez were winning trophies playing a brand of football that involved low block defences, numerous massive grock holding mids, and hitting long balls to a target man hoping for a knock down to Lampard or Gerrard to smash in. They both majored on set pieces as well. It was risk free, low mistake, direct long ball football. You never heard it pointed out in the media though.
The best football is the one that wins so I’m not arguing that under Moyes we were better than these sides, we weren’t. We were slow all over the team, weak, short, and didn’t have the power to play top 4 teams away from home, or the pace to play on the counter.
But it does make me laugh when people say we played direct football under Moyes. Like who would even compete for the long ball? We’d all be donating organs to see some of the passing moves we saw during that period in the current team.