Confirmed Signing Richarlison

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tel001 said:
Mate he cost 11.5m 12 months ago , he scored 5 goals I’m 12 games and trumed to crap.

So now we are offering to pay a club nearly a 400% profit on him
Click to expand...

PSV paid 8m Euros for Lozano, so if we paid 30m Euros, thats not far off 400% profit, right?

Not that I think we could get Lozano for 30m Euros mind.
 


Bluewolf said:
Less risky then a young player with experience in the premier league. That has worked with our manager before and perfectly fits into his system and style of play?

The way I look at it is we're paying the 35 million we were going to pay for malcom. Everyone was happy about spending it then. On some midget from a crap leauge who's never thrown in a tackle in his life. Regardless of how good he was going forward silvas style requires the wide players to have a defensive edge to them, malcom is lacking in this area to say the least.

My point being individual brilliance isn't what we need now. What we need it to bring players in that will fit our system and make us a team.
Click to expand...

Less risky as he is cheaper so if he flops we don’t lose as much money , more chance of reward as a 30m pound purchase he wont have to perform to as high a standard to be able to sell him on for a profit or even not at a loss, he has worked with brands before and played well in a World Cup . So yeah financially he’s less of a risk , and prem experience ? What does that mean anyway? Bolasie has 6 years prem experience, shame long has years, tony Hibbert has 10 years prem experience for god sake. Richalison has a season and he played well for rounghly 1\3 of it. Those games were all in a row at the start of the season, meaning he played 12 scores 5 which sounds good , he then went on to play 26 badly on a row which is concerning is it not? Can say he was tired? Marco left? Was adjusting? But the reality is he was very bad for the last 6 months or so and didn’t turn it round. And adjusting to a league usually means you start badly ? Adjust and get to grips and improve , he done the opposite. I’m not saying he’s a bad player or doesn’t have potential but jelavic has a similar spell did he not? Richalison is better than bolasie , but that’s not hard and most players in the same position are , but at 50m , add ons or not , he’s a huge risk and for him to pay off financially, he’s going to have to become a 10-15 goals a season winger or else we are going to end up in another bolasie situation again and loaning not him out to Turkish clubs I’m a couple of years. This is exactly what happened to Leeds. Paying massive fees and wages to players than signed them flipped or couldn’t be arsed and had to pay half their wages after they left .
 
Yorkie89 said:
People just need to get they’re heads round the few so bloody what if it’s 50m it’s not your money to spend so if that’s what we pay then so be it. Alls I’m bothered about if he comes in and smashes it for everton
Click to expand...

I do t care about spending big money either , but on decent players. Nobody else would pay that for him, literally no other club in the world, your only arsed about players coming in and smashing it ? What happens if we can’t sign players in a couple of years because we have over spent on heaps of players we can’t sell? Basically a similar situation to what we have now x5 , that’s wouldn’t bother you?
 

Papa Shango said:
If this is the player that Silva wants then I don't give a toss about the fee involved.

People demand we spend money, we try and spend it and then moan we are spending too much.

Get with the times people, players cost loads of money these days.

Oh and as for the 5 goal thing, well he's not an out and out striker.
Click to expand...

Yeah spend it, not throw it away . This seems exactly the same as last season with pockford, Keane,siggy we are overpaying because we can’t attract decent players.
 
Tel001 said:
Yeah spend it, not throw it away . This seems exactly the same as last season with pockford, Keane,siggy we are overpaying because we can’t attract decent players.
Click to expand...

I think we can pretty much say we didnt throw money away on Pickford, the others we could certainly discuss.
 
Toffee in Jandals said:
It's not our money. Swings and roundabouts.... We made a profit of 50m+ on Lukaku, 40m+ on Stones. Potentially if Lookman goes, we'll make a profit of 10m or so on him as well.

The fee for Richarlison, if correct as reported, IS insane...... But that is the market sadly. Lets not forget we once even sold Victor Anichebe for 6m.
Click to expand...

Lookman and richalison should be the same value mate. Selling one for 16-20m and buying another for more than double the price is stupid
 
Toffee in Jandals said:
Exactly. Even if Richarlison doesn't work out, he's only 21, three years' time his best years are likely still ahead of him and I'd be very surprised if we didn't recoup most, if not all, of what we would have paid for him now.
Click to expand...

Let’s say he plays 2-3 season and averages 4 goals a season, you think we will be recouping 50m?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top