No need to qualify your comment; at this point DCL is flat out the better player. He’s clearly superior as the main striker, but I’d argue he’d also be more effective than Richarlison from the flanks or as a support striker. DCL’s all-round game is something to behold: quick, a relentless presser, wonderful hold up play, great layoffs, fantastic channel runs and off the ball movement, aggressive and physical, awesome aerial prowess and can shoot well with either foot. Richarlison by comparison is beginning to look like a one trick pony whose one trick has been sussed out.
The people on this forum calling him an £80-100m player are overly optimistic if not outright delusional. Do you really think that any club is going to spend that money for a player who is objectively inferior to the likes of Son, Mane, Salah, Sterling, Jota, Ziyech, Pulisic, Mahrez and Rashford, who play in his position in the EPL? I’d argue that players like Podence, Neto and even Barnes probably have more upside than Richarlison, as they seem to be on an upward career trajectory, whilst Richarlison looks to be stagnating. If he truly is angling for a move, on this season’s showing the club would be scrambling to recoup its £50m investment.