None of them are the same thing. The only two vaguely similar ones are mentions of our home form, but they relate to different aspects and show different contexts.Well a lot of those are kind of the same thing. And if results have been poor at home but we're not struggling near the bottom then obviously it's balanced elsewhere.
Other points you've made are speculation. And I think if you have counted losing over two legs to a City side full of superstars is a downside then surely it's obviously balanced by how well we did to that point and included in a goal that shouldn't have stood. And you've decided that Barry having a great season is a negative too.
On the whole I'm not too sure this is particularly balanced.
Barry having a great season is very much a positive, but the fact that we are still heavily reliant on him going into what may well be the final season of his career is undoubtedly concerning. It's unlikely that we can replace him like for like so i would have liked to see a progression in how we play to prevent this having a major impact, but our latest game shows we're a long way from that.
If you don't think blowing a 2 goal lead in a semi final is a downside then i think you have very, very, very low expectations of the team you support. The fact that our team was cheaper did not comfort me on my way home from the Etihad, and the fact that our team had been more expensive than all the ones we beat on the way to the semi would kind of take away any pleasure i'd felt in getting that far even if i was so minded.
Sorry, what do you want me to do? I'm using examples to show that the point you made was wrong, and you're telling me I'm not allowed to use examples?So you're using Hull and Wigan not attracting top class players as an example. Villa are in meltdown. We're not. Other than that. One player went to Spurs. They have a good profile abroad despite rarely playing in champion's league, partly because of the style they are known for.
City were so rich it's ridiculous and paid wages we never can, but still had to show they could maintain a champion's league place to attract absolute quality. Even now though I'd argue they may not be a lot more of an attraction than team who've been there for decades. And people have been talking about Rom leaving since he arrived. If he goes it will be to a much higher profile team and doubtless this would have happened if we got fourth.
You used the argument that winning the cup would attract top players. I challenged the viewpoint by pointing that the last team to win the cup without being one of the game's superpowers didn't seem to get this memo. I also used the previous two finalists just to give a bit more context. If you like, I can go back to the last team from outside the big boys before Wigan - Portsmouth. Again, not sure all these European players were sat at home dreaming of playing for Pompey while they were watching that.