mkrudden
Player Valuation: £40m
More teams can AFFORD a 20+ striker than HAVE a 20+ striker.
That's a VERY important thing for all of you who want to sell Rom need to remember.
If the budget does change (I will believe it when I see it) then I dispute your contention we have to wait until 17/18. Other clubs have got CL players before they qualified for the CL. Hell look at Teixeira and the rest of them that went to China. Oscar allegedly almost went to China for 75m and I'm supposed to sell Lukaku because we have no hope of attracting CL players without the CL? Doesn't add up.
Often "I want to play in the Champions League" means "I want more money."
Your logic for selling Lukaku relies on us having world class players supplying him. Why don't we just sell those players too though? Isn't everything you've said true for them too?
We tried for DECADES before Rom to buy a striker. We had more money than most teams in the world. We failed. We failed until we stepped up to the plate and paid huge money and it was touch and go to get him here even then.
That anyone wants to go back to that period I cannot comprehend.
15 goals sounds like it's close to 20+ but it's not. It's a long way away. Here is why:
More players can score 15 goals a season than 20. A lot more. When you have a 20+ guy you start off with a fairly huge advantage over your opponents. They have to find midfield goals just to get even with you.
Given your stated scenario of world class players supplying a striker I'd suggest a 10 goal striker for a normal team might get 15 with Del/Yarm.
So now all we need to find is some bang average striker who can usually muster 10 if he plays in every game. Surround him with enough talent and he gets 15 now!
Lots of teams can get the 10-15 guy.
Hell Niasse can probably get 15 if he played all year with those players. Let's just sell Rom and not replace him at all. Pure profit baby!
.
For starters, I don't "want" to sell RL. I said there is an inevitability because he wants CL next season. We can't offer that. If he goes, it's about who we replace him with. With 40-60mil burning a hole in our pocket, we can do a job.
And it's this point which you seemingly have ignored when talking about the past.
"We tried for DECADES before Rom to buy a striker. We had more money than most teams in the world. We failed. We failed until we stepped up to the plate and paid huge money and it was touch and go to get him here even then.
That anyone wants to go back to that period I cannot comprehend."
Yes. We did. With no money. What do you expect to buy when you have nothing in your wallet? You have to take punts:
Beckford.
Jelavic
Bent
Johnson
To name just four below 10mil purchases.
When we made money through sales, we brought in Yakubu. Had an atrocious not occurred, we would have got 3/4 years of consistent goalscoring from him. His previous record suggested that.
Bony was an example of someone who has consistently scored goals. When you're richer than rich like city, you don't generally buy a player if he is cack. Bony isn't cack. His record suggests he will get 15/20 goals a season.
"Hell Niasse can probably get 15 if he played all year with those players. Let's just sell Rom and not replace him at all. Pure profit baby!"
Again, you've misunderstood. My assertion was that, under the previous model, based on signing youngsters and developing them, selling them if they want to leave, a 30mil profit in 2 years is excellent business and shows the model works. Kudos to the manager.
If we can entice RL to stay, brilliant. Ideal scenario. I personally think top 4 within RM's first four seasons was unrealistic thus I'd always envisaged losing RL as part of the rebuilding. That's just me.