Clint Dempsey went to the MLS for 6 million in August. Jermain Defoe also went for 6 million to the MLS.
Early days on both signings really.
Clint Dempsey went to the MLS for 6 million in August. Jermain Defoe also went for 6 million to the MLS.
Yeah, I was more trying to illustrate that strikers are ridiculously expensive.Early days on both signings really.
Yeah, I was more trying to illustrate that strikers are ridiculously expensive.
I mean...MLS is paying 6 million for over the hill strikers. You either have to have oil money, strike gold on an unknown, get by with mediocre(Kone, Jelavic), or grow your own strikers.
Or use the loan market I guess.
I think that's an interesting discussion actually.Hull seemed to have done alright so far.
Not really by a long way.What the MLS pay for players is not really relevant. They're buying prestige - a big name. Not to mention talent. By it's own standards; Defoe is now the best player in the league by a long way.
Not really by a long way.
Henry. Dempsey, Bradley, Donovan. He may be the best player, but it's not like Zlatan in the French league.
Not really by a long way.
Henry. Dempsey, Bradley, Donovan. He may be the best player, but it's not like Zlatan in the French league.
You'd know better than me. I don't watch MLS.Yeah, or he may not be the best player in the league.
Arguably, out of those names, only Donovan could cut it in the prem. Defoe has still been banging goals in at a much higher level than the MLS for the last season and a half.
Arguably, out of those names, only Donovan could cut it in the prem. Defoe has still been banging goals in at a much higher level than the MLS for the last season and a half.
I think I'd take Bradley, just because we're so desperately weak in CM, of course, he could be awful, I really don't know.Put it this way, there's only Defoe and Donovan I'd have in the Everton squad for a year or two.
I think that's an interesting discussion actually.
I think when you play a game like Hull does (or West Ham, or any Pulis team) you can get by with cheaper strikers. I think those teams need poachers more than anything. Players that can poke the ball into the net as it bounces around in the box. And there are a lot of those players, of varying quality, but there are a bunch of them, which keeps the prices down a bit.
I don't think that style will ever get a team in the CL from the Premier league again though. I don't think it works (often enough) against teams with superior quality. So you need to change the style to be more cutting, and less hopeful. The problem for us, is that strikers that can work on a team set up to make the CL are really quite expensive, because they have more to do. It's no longer just put the ball in the net. Not every attack is funneled to them. Now they need to link up with midfield more and open up space for the midfield players to get goals to go along with scoring themselves. By definition that's a more difficult task.
I suspect that the cost of a midtable striker to a CL striker has a higher cost-growth than any other position because it's not just doing the same job but better, it's doing a fundamentally different job.
Or I'm stupid, Everton get crap strikers and that's just the way it is.
I agree, maybe in 11 years we can start the "compared with Moyes" shouts.
Martinez should be judged in his tenure alone, at least for the next 5 years.