He did last seasonBut.so far he's not had the money to sort that problem
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He did last seasonBut.so far he's not had the money to sort that problem
Like I said above, I think he will drop the two defensive players once we find someone capable of playing in the 10 role. We don't have anyone who could do a better job there than someone in defensive mid, if you get what I mean.
He could easily have got a number 10 mate over the past 2 years.
You can't say we are playing a certain way with 2 dm's because there are no number 10's out there.
You have to play the way you want because you believe in it not because you can't find a number 10
I don't think he will because he clearly rates Barry and McCarthy as two of his automatic starters. Obviously hope I'm wrong.
I'd just love to see us with Barkley in that deeper role, it would give our play a completely new dimension. Especially against teams who don't have much interest in going at us.
And then people would moan if we didn't buy RomHe did last season
And then people would moan if we didn't buy Rom
Come on he has had 2 years to get a number 10 if thats how you want to play.No, I can, I truly believe he thinks Barry does a better job in defensive mid than Naismith or Osman would do at number 10. I believe that if and when we get a number 10, he will change against certain teams.
You say he could have easily have gotten a number 10 like it's a matter of going down the shops. I'm sorry mate but it's laughable. They're extremely expensive, and may not want to leave their current club.
There's so much more to signing players, surely this week with Stones and Yarmalenko proves this?
He has had plenty time to get a number 10.And then people would moan if we didn't buy Rom
Come on he has had 2 years to get a number 10 if thats how you want to play.
We could have loaned one or bought a cheaper one.
All number 10's don't cost 20 million mate
Come on he has had 2 years to get a number 10 if thats how you want to play.
We could have loaned one or bought a cheaper one.
All number 10's don't cost 20 million mate
Why do you think a number 10 has to be 20 mill to be good.We already have crap number 10s, why would we want to buy another crap one?
I thought we were trying to improve.
Again, could we have? Have we tried? How do you know? All these questions mate, you need to just sit back for a second, these guys aren't getting paid to turn up for lunch, they'd be searching "24/7" to use a horrible phrase.
Look at the Stoke player, he turned us down. Stoke ffs. It's not that simple.
Why do you think a number 10 has to be 20 mill to be good.
What your saying is the manager has been playing 2 dm's for 2 years cos he can't find a number 10 thats crazy.
The lad ki at swansea was a loanee he would have done a good job for a start
Come on he has had 2 years to get a number 10 if thats how you want to play.
We could have loaned one or bought a cheaper one.
All number 10's don't cost 20 million mate
Think theres a valid point by both here.I think Bobby has being hoping Ross would grow into the no 10 he wants .Come on he has had 2 years to get a number 10 if thats how you want to play.
We could have loaned one or bought a cheaper one.
All number 10's don't cost 20 million mate
Come on he has had 2 years to get a number 10 if thats how you want to play.
We could have loaned one or bought a cheaper one.
All number 10's don't cost 20 million mate