100 Million is pocket change to Abramovich, I wonder why he's baulking?
The much better Costa has stopped sulking and is staying ???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
100 Million is pocket change to Abramovich, I wonder why he's baulking?
It was Kompany.
I wouldn't. Would be a disaster.
We need a bid around £80m and get rid as soon as possible.
why? who would you replace him with?
The much better Costa has stopped sulking and is staying ???
That isn't the question in my view. There are options around in world football and we need to build to play football in a different and better way than what involves ol' ping pong shins.
But the main reason it'd be a disaster is the disruption the player causes and his "me me me" attitude. We'd have another year of speculation, exacerbated every time he goes to Belgium, and playing easily nullified football instead of getting on with building the squad with players for the long term.
We have to sell this summer. We'd be mad not to. Sure, not for £40-50m, but any bid around £80m should be accepted on the spot at this point.
Rom will eclipse Costa in time should Chelsea get their man
you have a point and i agree if we can get a top quality replacement, just no idea who.
Iheanacho. I suspect we're just flat refusing to have a buyback clause. I'd bid enough that city would accept without one, personally, he'll be incredibly good when playing regularly. My pick anyway, along with another option like Sandro.
If we keep Barkley, anyone who can run a channel and pull defenders about as well as take a ball to feet adequately as an outball will be an improvement on what we've got.
If Chelsea replace Costa with Lukaku, here's my prediction and I'm certain it's true - he'll score as many as Costa, perhaps more, but they'll finish 15 points approx worse off in the league.
Not a chance.
I wonder if Rom is sitting down pondering over his ......for. or against list.