Titus Bramble
Best centre half to grace the Premier League
I don't know, Titus.
Fair enough lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know, Titus.
When he said in the presser that 'everyone knows you don't just become a champions league club in one year(from where he started)' had me thinking the same, if Southampton had our ambition he wouldn't of left there.
Either way, I'm not fussed, if he goes I doubt we'll be going to the championship for a new manager next time like we did with Moyes and Martinez
The more I listen to this guy the more confident I am he will get us trophies!
On that, cred with the players, it was obvious from the Rooney presser today that Koeman had worked hard building a narrative with him to make the move work.
Anyone who thinks this all happened in the last few days, or weeks, is living in cloud cuckoo land. Stuff has been going on for months I reckon.
Why do you care mate if we have overpaid by £10m?RK's had an excellent first season and deserves the support he's gotten thus far regarding new recruits but he shouldn't be allowed to push the club into a paying a ludicrous price for Gylfi particularly after he's handled Barkley badly. Whatever our budget it's finite and paying £40-£50m for a lower half Premiership player who turns 28 in September is utterly reckless. Like Bolasie, Gylfi's value will plummet within a couple of seasons of signing, just when RK will be making his exit. SW needs to assert himself and identity an alternative if Swansea hold out. It appears we're trying to do a Spurs and break into the top 4 by developing a team with moderate investment and therefore can't afford this kind of wastefulness.
The article from the Independent sums up Gylfi as a £40m+ player.
"I managed a laugh of disbelief when I read that Swansea had turned down a £40M bid for their midfielder Gylfi Sigurdsson. Even now, £40M is a big figure for a midfielder outside the Champions League, but Swansea are holding out for more. Maybe I was missing something?
Checking Gylfi's stats, he scored 9 goals last season and had 13 assists, excellent numbers for a midfielder. 3 of the goals were from penalties, but no matter how you slice it, the assist total was excellent. What's weird though is how those assists came about. I went back and watched film of all the assists. 8 of the 13 were from set pieces. 2 of the goals were also from set pieces. Add the penalties back in, and out of 22 goals or assists, more than half came from dead ball situations. That's not a bad thing. Set pieces are an underexploited weapon for most clubs and arguably helped Chelsea win the title, and Sigurdsson has a great right-footed delivery. However, it also means the output doesn't justify the supposed asking price.
Even in an inflated market, for £40-50M you expect a midfield dynamo capable of defending and who carves open the opposition from open play. Gylfi doesn't do that. Take out the dead ball stats, and the shine comes off. Defending has always been an afterthought in his game, and while he has flashes of brilliance - the backheel flick that created a goal against Burnley comes to mind - they don't happen often enough to merit a massive price tag. You end up with an attacking midfielder who doesn't defend much and had 4 goals and 5 assists in 38 appearances last season.
In Sigurdsson's favour, he has been remarkably durable during his time in South Wales, appearing in 32, 36, and all 38 games the last 3 seasons. On the other hand, his age is a consideration and works against a big price. He turns 28 in September, meaning a normal four-year contract will be almost entirely post-peak years.
Even with the Proven Premier League Player premium, which when you think of all the great players in the league that started outside of England seems more hopelessly naive than a mark of quality at this point, Sigurdsson's fee should probably be around half of the rumoured asking price. Compare that to the business Brighton did earlier in the summer for German deadball specialist Pascal Gross at €4M, and it still seems like a lot, but Gylfi does have talent, and he is well loved by Swans fans and coaches alike.
But £50M for Gylfi Sigurdsson? If someone paid that, we'd have to call it The Welsh Job, because it would be the transfer heist of the century."
RK's had an excellent first season and deserves the support he's gotten thus far regarding new recruits but he shouldn't be allowed to push the club into a paying a ludicrous price for Gylfi particularly after he's handled Barkley badly. Whatever our budget it's finite and paying £40-£50m for a lower half Premiership player who turns 28 in September is utterly reckless. Like Bolasie, Gylfi's value will plummet within a couple of seasons of signing, just when RK will be making his exit. SW needs to assert himself and identity an alternative if Swansea hold out. It appears we're trying to do a Spurs and break into the top 4 by developing a team with moderate investment and therefore can't afford this kind of wastefulness.
The article from the Independent sums up Gylfi as a £40m+ player.
"I managed a laugh of disbelief when I read that Swansea had turned down a £40M bid for their midfielder Gylfi Sigurdsson. Even now, £40M is a big figure for a midfielder outside the Champions League, but Swansea are holding out for more. Maybe I was missing something?
Checking Gylfi's stats, he scored 9 goals last season and had 13 assists, excellent numbers for a midfielder. 3 of the goals were from penalties, but no matter how you slice it, the assist total was excellent. What's weird though is how those assists came about. I went back and watched film of all the assists. 8 of the 13 were from set pieces. 2 of the goals were also from set pieces. Add the penalties back in, and out of 22 goals or assists, more than half came from dead ball situations. That's not a bad thing. Set pieces are an underexploited weapon for most clubs and arguably helped Chelsea win the title, and Sigurdsson has a great right-footed delivery. However, it also means the output doesn't justify the supposed asking price.
Even in an inflated market, for £40-50M you expect a midfield dynamo capable of defending and who carves open the opposition from open play. Gylfi doesn't do that. Take out the dead ball stats, and the shine comes off. Defending has always been an afterthought in his game, and while he has flashes of brilliance - the backheel flick that created a goal against Burnley comes to mind - they don't happen often enough to merit a massive price tag. You end up with an attacking midfielder who doesn't defend much and had 4 goals and 5 assists in 38 appearances last season.
In Sigurdsson's favour, he has been remarkably durable during his time in South Wales, appearing in 32, 36, and all 38 games the last 3 seasons. On the other hand, his age is a consideration and works against a big price. He turns 28 in September, meaning a normal four-year contract will be almost entirely post-peak years.
Even with the Proven Premier League Player premium, which when you think of all the great players in the league that started outside of England seems more hopelessly naive than a mark of quality at this point, Sigurdsson's fee should probably be around half of the rumoured asking price. Compare that to the business Brighton did earlier in the summer for German deadball specialist Pascal Gross at €4M, and it still seems like a lot, but Gylfi does have talent, and he is well loved by Swans fans and coaches alike.
But £50M for Gylfi Sigurdsson? If someone paid that, we'd have to call it The Welsh Job, because it would be the transfer heist of the century."
It's simple mate he has to produce, it's his team now and a lot of money has been invested to get his team, so their can't be any excuses. Am sure Moshiri will will think the same.. My only concern is have we changed too much too soon??So what are our expectations for Expensive Dutch Moyes in Year 2?
Practically all his own team now with 9 of the first choice XI his signings.
I'd usually excuse the manager some time to settle in his players but he has paid a massive premium for proven PL performers so surely we must be hoping for better than last year?
Obviously our best 2 attacking players from the last 2 years are gone/going and look to be replaced by Rooney/Sigurdsson/Sandro. 2 very experienced players and one exciting youngster. All free kick specialists.
Koeman and Walsh. It's been going on since Dunc's testimonial.We know it has.
Both Koeman and Walsh as good as said it during the Sky day.
Wayne was always coming home after that.