whiteshadow
Player Valuation: £20m
I may be missing something, but there seem to be a lot of people who think that because Koeman finished 7th at Southampton, that Koeman can't do better 7th than us? How does that make any sense at all?
Plus Koeman has finished 1st on a few occasions with other clubs?
I can think of plenty of managers who have won leagues and weren't good enough in the long run, and I can think of plenty of managers who have done mid table and then went on to find consistent success.
People don't like to use their brains, they just like to pigeon hole every single manager in to a category because actually studying the manager and his capabilities would take thought as well as effort. Far easier to just say a manager with less resources at a smaller club is rubbish and not capable of finishing higher, even with more resources and any manager who wins trophies at a club with tons of money to spend is amazing, despite it not always being true.