Bungle
Player Valuation: £90m
My guess is at least four of those six.
Which is fine if they pay us £80m.
But there's 7 mate? Although if the mods have added Liverpool to the swear filter at last then fair play.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My guess is at least four of those six.
Which is fine if they pay us £80m.
But there's 7 mate? Although if the mods have added Liverpool to the swear filter at last then fair play.
Sorry should have clarified - four of those six clubs and one cult.
From a neutral point of view this is an honest take on Barkley and England.
If i was a fan of any other club i would see barkley as a fantastic talent who was woefully underused in our defeats in the WC. someone who needs the space and time on the ball but at the same time can be an absolute star. Bringing him on for 20 minutes and throwing him up when chasing a game (twice- 1 to stay in cup) without passing it to him or making him the creative influence was one of the reasons why we struggled to beat the two.
From a foriegn perspective;
those english have a really good talent who they are not playing in favour of a winger who keeps running into the defender and two midfielders who havent done anything to control the game. No wonder the english are going out, our talent is starting games for us.
Any of that accurate opinions or is my blue bias creeping in?
btw im not foreign or a fan of any other club
This! Roy had decided on sterling, it didn't matter what happened in the friendly games sterling was his "Gazza 90" He even moved Rooney to accommodate him. Ross was always gonna be coming on from the bench.
If Rooney
Both Michael Ballack and Dietmar Hamann have said he should have started - with Hartman saying he would have even for Germany - and Germans seem to know a little bit about good midfielders.From a neutral point of view this is an honest take on Barkley and England.
If i was a fan of any other club i would see barkley as a fantastic talent who was woefully underused in our defeats in the WC. someone who needs the space and time on the ball but at the same time can be an absolute star. Bringing him on for 20 minutes and throwing him up when chasing a game (twice- 1 to stay in cup) without passing it to him or making him the creative influence was one of the reasons why we struggled to beat the two.
From a foriegn perspective;
those english have a really good talent who they are not playing in favour of a winger who keeps running into the defender and two midfielders who havent done anything to control the game. No wonder the english are going out, our talent is starting games for us.
Any of that accurate opinions or is my blue bias creeping in?
btw im not foreign or a fan of any other club
It wouldn't surprsie me if Barkley goes and Suarez stays.Ross is apparently starting tommorrow along side Lampard, I think he'll do well and shine.
Who do we expect him to be linked with on Wednesday morning? Man U, Chelsea, Liverpool, City, Arsenal, Barca or Real Madrid?
I'd like to see the diving completion rate in the last 30 minutes against Uruguay along with Sturridge and Johnson, I'll bet they're impressive.I'd love to see Sterlings dribble and pass completion rate this tournament. Must be through the floor.
All players loose the ball, Barkley had an overall 96% pass completion rate over the two games. Enough said.
But some his best performances have come by running from deep after narrowly getting/keeping the ball.The issue wasn't how often he lost the ball, it's when and where he did it. He was trying to turn players pressing him in his own defensive third. He has a good touch and can pick a pass, but his decision making is questionable at times to say the least.