right let me stop you right there, it's not regardless of the facts, it's an opinion, don't be so high and mighty, it's an extremely off putting characteristic when debating with someone.You choosing who you bash regardless of the facts.
McCarthy, Barry, Jagielka... The latter two especially have been very, very good this season. They were poor today, I can't argue with you, but there's no perspective to anything you say. You don't give them any credit when they play well, which dilutes your "constructive" criticism of them when they play poorly. You're blinded to the positives they bring because of their inability in certain aspects of their game. What's the alternative? Oh wait...
Ive just seen your point about Gibson being the better player than both McCarthy and Barry...yet the only basis you have for that is a collective approximate 20mins in two seasons. It's quite laughable imo mate. Gibson is a bad crock who obviously has ability but fails to look after himself outside of football which leads to him not being able to be of use to the team. But yet he gets your loyalty and support?!
And then you call @Dithering Dougie, who even if you don't agree with him like I do on most, is at least supportive of the players on the pitch rather than bashing them, "damo".
As I say, the midfield pair today were poor...as was every single player on that pitch. It's why we got tonked 3-0 by an average utd side.
I don't agree Barry has been 'very very good' this season, he's been okay, but regardless my main points were about how the manager set his team up and I'm very happy to debate this issue, and his selections made it impossible or very unlikely to get the best out of ross, I used the same point for Rom, my main complaint was with the manager and that was the theme of my posts through the match day thread, I did single Naismith out as he was beyond terrible, someone I've saying isn't good enough for us and you've been defending, so not surprising you've left him out of your quite selective post, as it doesn't suit you're argument very well.
So my opinion on Gibson, when fully fit being a finer footballer than macarthy or barry, why is that based on 20 minutes? not the two previous seasons? My post was pretty much a defense of Martinez deciding not to use him, as i stated in that post we have no clue what state Gibson is in, again very selective in your argument, determined to paint me in a certain light.
As for Douglas, he's a wum of the highest order, I doubt he believes half of what he types, the fact you can't see that is pretty funny, the fact you always agree with him is even funnier, he argues in the same fashion as damo, boring people into submission with the same nonsense over and over again