Yeah, still he's chosen the Barkley question to make the point that he needs other players who offer something different.
And that's completely fine, but he could have said it without singling out Barkley yet again, because he's making it abundantly clear he doesn't value the asset and therefore the asset can be acquired on the cheap.
It's not the way to do things. If he wants rid, honestly fine, but pretend you want to keep him and force a club to go the extra mile to get his contract. It's what we've done with players over the years like Rooney, Lescott, Stones, Jeffers etc. and worked well - the difference this time is an egotist manager is putting his own ego over smart transfer policy.