Ross Barkley

[Nymzee]

If he went next summer as a free agent would we be due hefty compensation?

 

[Toffeepot]

If he went next summer as a free agent would we be due hefty compensation?

no he's too old, to the best of my knowledge

 

[Super Kevin sheedy]

AC Delco more like.

Is that place still going

 

[Brownie]

Barks

 

[Nymzee]

no he's too old, to the best of my knowledge

I thought that but he's the same age as that Charlie Taylor @ Leeds and they'd get compo at a tribunal when he leaves on a free this summer.

 

[sam17]

I thought that but he's the same age as that Charlie Taylor @ Leeds and they'd get compo at a tribunal when he leaves on a free this summer.

If he left this Summer on a free we would have. He's over 24 next year so we'd get nothing

 

[Connor]

 

[ilikecheese]

2 reasons.

1. They waste a year being with the kids, and not exactly in the shop window.

2. It hardly shows the attitude a buying club would find attractive.

The classic example of how to do it right, was Suarez at that lot. Played brilliant, enhanced his rep, and everyone was a winner.

If it became the norm though it's far more player friendly that way. Let's say multiple players had their contract running down at the same time. Would a club really risk league position in order to 'punish' their star players who want to test an open market? Even then it wouldn't mean they are leaving the club.

 

[a bell maul]

AC Delco more like.

He'd be just a spare part there!

 

[Barnfred 55]

2 reasons.

1. They waste a year being with the kids, and not exactly in the shop window.

2. It hardly shows the attitude a buying club would find attractive.

The classic example of how to do it right, was Suarez at that lot. Played brilliant, enhanced his rep, and everyone was a winner.

I thought he forced his transfers through by biting players. Not being flippant by the way. I truly believe this to be the case.

Can't argue that he wasn't brilliant in his last season at Liverpool by the way.

 

[Eggsyblueskin]

If it became the norm though it's far more player friendly that way. Let's say multiple players had their contract running down at the same time. Would a club really risk league position in order to 'punish' their star players who want to test an open market? Even then it wouldn't mean they are leaving the club.

I have to say that , personally , I find it difficult to fully support a player who was planning to jib us off so cynically and thus denying us the funds to replace him at the same time. If a player has no commitment to the future, find his replacement as soon as possible.

 

[ilikecheese]

I have to say that , personally , I find it difficult to fully support a player who was planning to jib us off so cynically and thus denying us the funds to replace him at the same time. If a player has no commitment to the future, find his replacement as soon as possible.

But if it were the norm then player fees are unnecessary...all free transfers.

 

[4737carlin]

He'd be just a spare part there!

He'd be a spare part here as well if he stays

 

[Eggsyblueskin]

But if it were the norm then player fees are unnecessary...all free transfers.

It would still revolve around the loyalty and commitment of the player for me. If a player intends no loyalty to the club, why would I show any loyalty to the player ?

 

[Joey66]

He'd be a spare part here as well if he stays

yopu want to have a go more at the useless Stek 40 grand he on to Robles 20 grand , and |I| bet we know which Keeper RK will dispense off this is really hurtful reading post so spiteful about a local lad if he moves on good luck to him!
I found a site on wages what a joke some of our deadbeats get paid , and Ross is not one of them!