Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably. Players have such bullet proof contracts these days, they can earn more money in a single day than the average yearly salary, and not even have to play to earn it.The thing is that Barkley has got as much chance of starting regularly at CFC as he would have at Spurs i.e. not much.
So this is about money.
Cannot see any way that we would refuse an offer from Spurs that was equal to Chelseas, despite whatever spurs briefed journalists may or may not be reporting. There's too much money at stake for that kind of misplaced pride.I agree and that is why I'm certain you don't have the full story from both sides.
It happens, we can pretend that we don't do it but we probably do.
Siggurdsson was more than likely tapped up so thats why Swansea dragged it out.
Stick your head in the sand and pretend we dont do underhand tactics. All clubs will try and do whatever they can.
The thing is that Barkley has got as much chance of starting regularly at CFC as he would have at Spurs i.e. not much.
So this is about money.
Is there any logical reason why that would be the case?
The thing is that Barkley has got as much chance of starting regularly at CFC as he would have at Spurs i.e. not much.
So this is about money.
If it was about money, he would have signed for Chelsea.
They will pay higher wages than us and Spurs.
Ross has cost the club 35m pounds. No actual Evertonian would do this.
A kopite snake is the only conclusion that can be drawn.
Not really by holding out until January or the end of his contract, it's win, win for the player. Less transfer fee in January, more wages, possibly signing on fee for the player. End of his contract, free transfer for the player again signing on fee, so really probably even more money for the player and less for Everton.