Yid4life
Player Valuation: £35m
I'm not wrong though.
Every shred of evidence points to Chelsea as the money option. There wage bill is more than double of ours and Spurs.
If we are going to look at other methods of payment as you say, these will be linked to agents payments and fees. Chelsea last season paid more than double of Everton and Spurs combined.
Whatever way you try to work it, Chelsea pay more in wages and signing on fees.
If he goes to Spurs, its not for the money but a career choice.
Exactly. Spurs players get between £40k & £110k per week. For argument sake lets assume Barkley would be paid £80k pw. At Chelsea he would earn at least £125kpw (probably more). Over the course of a 5 year contract he would earn £11.7mn less in wages. Even if Spurs paid him a £5mn signing on fee (we wouldn't) he is still £6.7mn worse off.
So while i can understand the frustration of EFC fans regarding missing out on a nice transfer fee (would rankle me in the same situation) accusations of being a 'money grabber' are wide of the mark (IMO).