They are all fair points, he does himself no favors and I agree his attitude could be better. I get everyone wants to take on the top 7 etc, but that’s unrealistic given the context. He didn’t recruit this team and pound for pound it’s poor. Having expectation beyond survival was unrealistic before he took over, it’s unfair to judge him on where we are in the table.
I agree on the style it’s awful, i again think he wants to play directly but can’t given the players at his disposal but is trying to get the best out of them and get results. Can performences improve I think they can. If you look at players he signed Tosun and Walcott they are direct players and I think if he stayed we could expect more of the same, no harm to my mind.
To be honest I think he is very like Moyes as a manager, he wants to play a results based game and is pragmatic. Their tenures mirror also, Moyes was brought in as a fire fighter and he did the job, rationalized the squad and incrementally improved quality and performences. I think Sam is similar and would expect much of the same if he stayed long term which he won’t. But I suspect there is some patsy work that will need to be done in culling a part of the squad and I suspect he may just be allowed to do it.
I’m not a particular advocate of him, if he goes he goes if he stays ok. I actually think stability is key in what is going to be a changing club behind the scenes in many roles in the year ahead. Objectively though he has done a job in a style that has been lauded in the past in similar relegation threats and similar to what Moyes and Royle did when they came in and were asked to save the club from lower divisions.
I’m just trying to be objective about him as I think the whole Anything But Sam narrative is a bit group thinky and not reflective of our context, his remit this season or his success in achieving it. If he stays the bjectives of survival and just results change of course and other questions need to be answered both on style, entertainment and progression.