• Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Scottish football

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 28206
  • Start date Start date

Where to start with your nonsense?

Firstly, what about the hypocrisy of a club that shouts from the rooftops about the army, invites them for sectarian jamborees at their stadium every year, but when it actually comes to parting with cash, well that would appear to be a step too far?

As for sidestepping ongoing historic abuse casers, I've sidestepped nothing. I just point out the world class hypocrisy of people who shout from the rooftops about abuse at Celtic Boys Club, but completely ignore the cover up for Gordon Neely in the 90's by Rangers, and the fact TRIFC are still covering it up. Now I know you have a habit of ignoring awkward questions, and jumping onto other topics, but I would really like you to answer this question. Are you seriously suggesting the victims of predatory paedophile Gordon Neely are all making it up?

When dealing with a Rangers fan you know at some stage they will bring up the abuse of teenage boys in Scotland, as long as that abuse was carried out by someone with a link to Celtic, the Catholic church, or Ireland. They absolutely love delving into the decades old abuse of youngsters. You can rest assured however that those brave seekers of truth and justice will turn a Nelson's eye, and a van Gogh ear towards the abuse that took place at their former club, unless it's to come out with the "We called the authorities on Gordon Neely" lie. Incredibly covering up for a predatory paedophile isn't even remotely close to being the worst cover up at Ibrox.

As for my complacency, and arrogance thinking Celtic were vastly superior, if you can stretch your tiny lizard brain back to just over a year ago, I said Rangers were deadly serious challengers for the title, in reply to your post wich ended with #55. How did that one work out for you?

Supporters of the plucky newco have been boasting about The 55 and getting aboard the 55 express blah blah bah since they came up to the top division, even boasting that their manager possessed a magic hat! Football is cyclical, and a team with 50,000 supporters was always going to win something eventually.

Now you have it that Celtic are going to have a few years of adversity. Like I told you last year, supporters of Rangers and TRIFC celebrate victory before the game has even kicked off. Now your celebrating next years title win before this one has even been clinched. Now Celtic may well have a few bad seasons, but the cash strapped newco are running at a loss every year, and any business that runs at a loss every year will eventually go out of business. I would have thought supporters of TRIFC PLC, or whatever the newco is calling itself these days, would know that more than anyone?

God bless SIR David Murray for that one btw. ;)

I mean I've never known them to highlight the peadophilia on their side at all. They all absoutely love the Queen, despite the fact she has defended that Prince Andrew. Never known one of them to ever apologise for that. When we know what we know now, we all know what they really love and defend when they proclaim they love the Queen/Royal family. No excuses now, we can all see whats going on. You choose to support them after this, we know what you are.

As for the 2nd part, Gerrard won't dominate for years and neither will Rangers. They've got lucky this year. They have an ageing squad. It falls off a cliff soon.

I watched that derby match ast time, Celtic were miles better than Rangers but couldn't finish. It happens. Gerrard has got lucky, nothing more.
 
I understand we have some Rangers fans on here. I mean it's a historical for supporters of our club, but it's by the by. However how anyone can not give it up when that knobhead took charge, and they started having songs like that is beyond me.

He will go down in folklaw now as well, as the man who stopped the 10 (despite the fact he eventually came 1st in a 2 horse race at about the 9th time of asking in all comps). I don't know how any Evertonian can go along with that. Just sack them off.
Stevie G: Rangers legend.

c071bfbdc62e2160bb881905470d9899.jpg
 

Why is it hypocritical for a club to say they support something financially but not be prepared to have it on the shirt?

At Everton we might support all sorts of things but not want to put it on the shirt. Seems fair enough to me.

As for the number 55 stuff, I had thought given Rangers went bust it's actually number 1 isn't it? But answer me this, surely you can derive no pleasure seeing that utter scumbag Gerrard get to the title mate? I can't see how anyone can look forward to his grubby little face getting to a title he's basically cheated to win anyway.

Long term, he will ruin Rangers like he ruins everything else. It's an old squad, and he will do damage as and when he leaves. No idea why most Rangers fans can't see through the fraud to be fair.

The 55 is only a thing because it carries on the continuity lie.

I can understand 25, 50, 75, and 100 being considered milestones. I can also understand even numbers going up in tens like 60, 70, 80 etc, but The 55? Why was there no The 15, or The 35? I don't remember anything being made of The 45, so why all of a sudden is The 55 a thing? :)
 
Where to start with your nonsense?

Firstly, what about the hypocrisy of a club that shouts from the rooftops about the army, invites them for sectarian jamborees at their stadium every year, but when it actually comes to parting with cash, well that would appear to be a step too far?

As for sidestepping ongoing historic abuse casers, I've sidestepped nothing. I just point out the world class hypocrisy of people who shout from the rooftops about abuse at Celtic Boys Club, but completely ignore the cover up for Gordon Neely in the 90's by Rangers, and the fact TRIFC are still covering it up. Now I know you have a habit of ignoring awkward questions, and jumping onto other topics, but I would really like you to answer this question. Are you seriously suggesting the victims of predatory paedophile Gordon Neely are all making it up?

When dealing with a Rangers fan you know at some stage they will bring up the abuse of teenage boys in Scotland, as long as that abuse was carried out by someone with a link to Celtic, the Catholic church, or Ireland. They absolutely love delving into the decades old abuse of youngsters. You can rest assured however that those brave seekers of truth and justice will turn a Nelson's eye, and a van Gogh ear towards the abuse that took place at their former club, unless it's to come out with the "We called the authorities on Gordon Neely" lie. Incredibly covering up for a predatory paedophile isn't even remotely close to being the worst cover up at Ibrox.

As for my complacency, and arrogance thinking Celtic were vastly superior, if you can stretch your tiny lizard brain back to just over a year ago, I said Rangers were deadly serious challengers for the title, in reply to your post wich ended with #55. How did that one work out for you?

Supporters of the plucky newco have been boasting about The 55 and getting aboard the 55 express blah blah bah since they came up to the top division, even boasting that their manager possessed a magic hat! Football is cyclical, and a team with 50,000 supporters was always going to win something eventually.

Now you have it that Celtic are going to have a few years of adversity. Like I told you last year, supporters of Rangers and TRIFC celebrate victory before the game has even kicked off. Now your celebrating next years title win before this one has even been clinched. Now Celtic may well have a few bad seasons, but the cash strapped newco are running at a loss every year, and any business that runs at a loss every year will eventually go out of business. I would have thought supporters of TRIFC PLC, or whatever the newco is calling itself these days, would know that more than anyone?

God bless SIR David Murray for that one btw. ;)
So your way of not sidestepping the paedophile ring that was operating within your clubs set-up and then covering it up for 40 odd years is to use unfounded whataboutery, classy!!
As for Rangers running at a loss, it must be giving you a hard-on thinking about what your new name is going to be for us!
 
The 55 is only a thing because it carries on the continuity lie.

I can understand 25, 50, 75, and 100 being considered milestones. I can also understand even numbers going up in tens like 60, 70, 80 etc, but The 55? Why was there no The 15, or The 35? I don't remember anything being made of The 45, so why all of a sudden is The 55 a thing? :)
It's obviously killing you.
 
So your way of not sidestepping the paedophile ring that was operating within your clubs set-up and then covering it up for 40 odd years is to use unfounded whataboutery, classy!!
As for Rangers running at a loss, it must be giving you a hard-on thinking about what your new name is going to be for us!

I have avoided nothing. I haven't denied one single thing about Celtic Boys Club. Why do supporters of TRIFC take to lying as naturally as breathing?

You have complete ignored the question I asked you. I won't be answering any of your questions until you deal with mine. I'll try again. Are you seriously suggesting the victims of predatory paedophile Gordon Neely are all making it up?
 

The 55 is only a thing because it carries on the continuity lie.

I can understand 25, 50, 75, and 100 being considered milestones. I can also understand even numbers going up in tens like 60, 70, 80 etc, but The 55? Why was there no The 15, or The 35? I don't remember anything being made of The 45, so why all of a sudden is The 55 a thing? :)

I dont get the 55 thing either.

It remind me of what Kopites do with arbitrary number. I remember them making out 18 was the only thing that mattered. Then United defeated that. And suddenly it was 18 & 5, 18 & 5 and how that was better than 20 & 3.

I cant really work it out.
 
I have avoided nothing. I haven't denied one single thing about Celtic Boys Club. Why do supporters of TRIFC take to lying as naturally as breathing?

You have complete ignored the question I asked you. I won't be answering any of your questions until you deal with mine. I'll try again. Are you seriously suggesting the victims of predatory paedophile Gordon Neely are all making it up?
Still avoiding and trying to deflect from admitting Celtic FC (aka Seperate entity fc) and Celtic Boys Club(the clue is in the name) were one and the same thing?
It's also ironic that 'The Celtic View' printed many articles and pictures showing that for many years Celtic Boys Club and their later convicted paedophile coaches were very much part of the Celtic family!
As for Neely, I don't doubt his victims claims at all but your claim and lame attempt to suggest that somehow Rangers had a similar blind eye approach to child abuse that Celtic obviously did is pretty desperate,As far as I'm aware there was one incident that was reported to Rangers by the boys father and Rangers sacked him as soon as they were made aware of any wrongdoing and reported him to the authorities what else were they meant to do? (sweep it under the carpet?)
Celtic have 5 convicted paedophiles now that worked under their watch for their boys club and you (just like your club) are denying that they have a duty to admit negligence in their duty of care within their boys club and compensate any victims involved.
 
Aye mate Celtic have won 15 of the last 20 titles, but The 55 is killing me! You're a fantasist. lol

P.S. Any chance you could answer the question you've ignored so far?
Glad to see you're finally recognising #55, you never know you'll be calling us Rangers and using terms like the Old Firm next!
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top