Scottish football

[larbert toffee]

Glorifying terrorists organisations?
You never been to a rangers game and had a pint in the bear pits?

Err, no he hasn't , he reads too many books and continually quotes them, he thinks if it's in print it's the truth, he doesn't experience match days which are real and irrefutable, that's the difference from what we know and what he thinks and it shows big time.

 

[The Celtic View]

So you're saying that Seperate Entity FC pandering to a certain sectarian element of their support to speak for the majority of people that follow the club is fine?
What about the hypocrisy of the only club that refuses to wear the poppy on their shirt but makes a £10k donation to the poppy fund every year to try and counter any criticism that comes their way?

You're a bit of an enigma, in that you tend to post like petulant child, yet your username would suggest you're probably at least 30.

I'm saying people should be allowed to wear, say, and do, whatever they like, within the parameters of the law. Also, I most certainly won't be lectured on behaviour from a supporter of TRIFC.

As for Separate Entity FC, I doubt I'm the only one who has noticed the weapons grade irony of a supporter of a club that claims to be Rangers 1872-2012 "Going for The 55" blah blah blah, but has referred victims to BDO, as the abuse took place at a separate company.

P.S. That ten grand donation you're criticising, is more than the cash strapped newco has donated. Typical Rangers, all flash, nae cash. All show, nae dough

 

[The Celtic View]

Does that go for Ben Davies too?

Who? I genuinely couldn't pick him out in a line up.

A bit like that nomark TRIFC player who said he walked up to Hampden beside the Celtic fans with a hat pulled down to hide his identity, when no one knew who the Fleck he was! To this day I genuinely couldn't pick him out of a line up either. It's debatable if even supporters of TRIFC would spot him.

 

[laudo9]

You're a bit of an enigma, in that you tend to post like petulant child, yet your username would suggest you're probably at least 30.

I'm saying people should be allowed to wear, say, and do, whatever they like, within the parameters of the law. Also, I most certainly won't be lectured on behaviour from a supporter of TRIFC.

As for Separate Entity FC, I doubt I'm the only one who has noticed the weapons grade irony of a supporter of a club that claims to be Rangers 1872-2012 "Going for The 55" blah blah blah, but has referred victims to BDO, as the abuse took place at a separate company.

P.S. That ten grand donation you're criticising, is more than the cash strapped newco has donated. Typical Rangers, all flash, nae cash. All show, nae dough

So you're ok with the hypocrisy bit regarding donation then?
Obviously being a hypocrite yourself when you try and sidestep your clubs own pathetic excuse for ongoing cases regarding historic abuse within their club with some made up accusations, difference being that the Seperate Entity FC abuse unfortunately isn't made up!
P. S. It's people like you (and your clubs) complacency and arrogance that has led to your downfall as while you lot have been lording it thinking you were so far ahead and vastly superior, having fly digs and spending all your time trying to convince anybody that would listen that Rangers were somehow not around anymore, the reality is that they are strolling to #55 and you're left supporting a car crash of a club with a multitude of problems to deal with on and off the pitch, hope you enjoy the next few years of adversity that's coming your way.

 

[PaddyJames]

So you're ok with the hypocrisy bit regarding donation then?
Obviously being a hypocrite yourself when you try and sidestep your clubs own pathetic excuse for ongoing cases regarding historic abuse within their club with some made up accusations, difference being that the Seperate Entity FC abuse unfortunately isn't made up!
P. S. It's people like you (and your clubs) complacency and arrogance that has led to your downfall as while you lot have been lording it thinking you were so far ahead and vastly superior, having fly digs and spending all your time trying to convince anybody that would listen that Rangers were somehow not around anymore, the reality is that they are strolling to #55 and you're left supporting a car crash of a club with a multitude of problems to deal with on and off the pitch, hope you enjoy the next few years of adversity that's coming your way.

You can't help lying can you lad? Even now, there, you're defending child molestors saying the victims made it up. Like I've said, scum from the top to the bottom.

 

[catcherintherye]

So you're ok with the hypocrisy bit regarding donation then?
Obviously being a hypocrite yourself when you try and sidestep your clubs own pathetic excuse for ongoing cases regarding historic abuse within their club with some made up accusations, difference being that the Seperate Entity FC abuse unfortunately isn't made up!
P. S. It's people like you (and your clubs) complacency and arrogance that has led to your downfall as while you lot have been lording it thinking you were so far ahead and vastly superior, having fly digs and spending all your time trying to convince anybody that would listen that Rangers were somehow not around anymore, the reality is that they are strolling to #55 and you're left supporting a car crash of a club with a multitude of problems to deal with on and off the pitch, hope you enjoy the next few years of adversity that's coming your way.

Why is it hypocritical for a club to say they support something financially but not be prepared to have it on the shirt?

At Everton we might support all sorts of things but not want to put it on the shirt. Seems fair enough to me.

As for the number 55 stuff, I had thought given Rangers went bust it's actually number 1 isn't it? But answer me this, surely you can derive no pleasure seeing that utter scumbag Gerrard get to the title mate? I can't see how anyone can look forward to his grubby little face getting to a title he's basically cheated to win anyway.

Long term, he will ruin Rangers like he ruins everything else. It's an old squad, and he will do damage as and when he leaves. No idea why most Rangers fans can't see through the fraud to be fair.

 

[catcherintherye]

In fairness, that's no great boast.

If the boy isn't already Scheidt we'll probably turn him into being Scheidt within a short space of time!

I think he will be ok. He's a 100% type of player, but lacks a bit of pace. No idea if you guys have got the funds to sign him long term but he will be ok.

I'd say he will be better than Taverier at Rangers, the one Gerrard thinks is world class.

 

[Cork Evertonian]

If the USSR had invaded Britain, there had been a battle, and it was agreed that London and it's surrounding areas were now part of the Soviet Union, would you wear badges honouring dead Russian soldiers?

Personally, I think people should be allowed to wear a poppy if they like, and if they don't want to wear one their opinion should be respected. This Poppy fascism is a relatively new thing, that started after Blair agreed to invade Iraq.

Before then clubs didn't wear poppy's on their shirts, and Remembrance Sunday was a time to reflect on the insanity of sending young men to their death. It wasn't a tub thumping, last day at the sectarian proms, day out in which soldiers abseiled from the roof of the stand, held up Keep Ulster Protestant scarves and sang about Bobby Sands, while a canon was fired at the side of the pitch!

To say the least, it would be a tad rich for a supporter of TRIFC to try take the moral high ground over songs about terrorist organisations.

P.S. Can't you see the hypocrisy of a club that deliberately avoided paying their taxes for years shouting about the army and the crown, Corky?

I would rather discuss the football tbh. Rangers did bad things in the past for sure. But Celtic have had their issues as well, although yes Celtic to my knowledge have never had a so called signing policy. But i don't wish to say any more on the matter, because we will all be going around in circles. I will say one final time though, that religion had nothing to do with Rangers early history. So anyway that's the last of what i wish to say about the matter.

 

[larbert toffee]

I would rather discuss the football tbh. Rangers did bad things in the past for sure. But Celtic have had their issues as well, although yes Celtic to my knowledge have never had a so called signing policy. But i don't wish to say any more on the matter, because we will all be going around in circles. I will say one final time though, that religion had nothing to do with Rangers early history. So anyway that's the last of what i wish to say about the matter.

Somebody out there give Corky a nudge, the needle is well and truly stuck, as for saying no more on the matter? You can't help yourself Corky you've been regurgitating this same Wham for years.
One final time? Don't make me laugh

 

[PaddyJames]

I would rather discuss the football tbh. Rangers did bad things in the past for sure. But Celtic have had their issues as well, although yes Celtic to my knowledge have never had a so called signing policy. But i don't wish to say any more on the matter, because we will all be going around in circles. I will say one final time though, that religion had nothing to do with Rangers early history. So anyway that's the last of what i wish to say about the matter.

Conveniently wanting to keep it to footy now you've been well and truly had off on the subject by people who know more than you. Fair play to you.

 

[Cork Evertonian]

Conveniently wanting to keep it to footy now you've been well and truly had off on the subject by people who know more than you. Fair play to you.

Enjoy Celtics final few months, as champions of Scotland mate.

 

[The Celtic View]

So you're ok with the hypocrisy bit regarding donation then?
Obviously being a hypocrite yourself when you try and sidestep your clubs own pathetic excuse for ongoing cases regarding historic abuse within their club with some made up accusations, difference being that the Seperate Entity FC abuse unfortunately isn't made up!
P. S. It's people like you (and your clubs) complacency and arrogance that has led to your downfall as while you lot have been lording it thinking you were so far ahead and vastly superior, having fly digs and spending all your time trying to convince anybody that would listen that Rangers were somehow not around anymore, the reality is that they are strolling to #55 and you're left supporting a car crash of a club with a multitude of problems to deal with on and off the pitch, hope you enjoy the next few years of adversity that's coming your way.

Where to start with your nonsense?

Firstly, what about the hypocrisy of a club that shouts from the rooftops about the army, invites them for sectarian jamborees at their stadium every year, but when it actually comes to parting with cash, well that would appear to be a step too far?

As for sidestepping ongoing historic abuse casers, I've sidestepped nothing. I just point out the world class hypocrisy of people who shout from the rooftops about abuse at Celtic Boys Club, but completely ignore the cover up for Gordon Neely in the 90's by Rangers, and the fact TRIFC are still covering it up. Now I know you have a habit of ignoring awkward questions, and jumping onto other topics, but I would really like you to answer this question. Are you seriously suggesting the victims of predatory paedophile Gordon Neely are all making it up?

When dealing with a Rangers fan you know at some stage they will bring up the abuse of teenage boys in Scotland, as long as that abuse was carried out by someone with a link to Celtic, the Catholic church, or Ireland. They absolutely love delving into the decades old abuse of youngsters. You can rest assured however that those brave seekers of truth and justice will turn a Nelson's eye, and a van Gogh ear towards the abuse that took place at their former club, unless it's to come out with the "We called the authorities on Gordon Neely" lie. Incredibly covering up for a predatory paedophile isn't even remotely close to being the worst cover up at Ibrox.

As for my complacency, and arrogance thinking Celtic were vastly superior, if you can stretch your tiny lizard brain back to just over a year ago, I said Rangers were deadly serious challengers for the title, in reply to your post wich ended with #55. How did that one work out for you?

Supporters of the plucky newco have been boasting about The 55 and getting aboard the 55 express blah blah bah since they came up to the top division, even boasting that their manager possessed a magic hat! Football is cyclical, and a team with 50,000 supporters was always going to win something eventually.

Now you have it that Celtic are going to have a few years of adversity. Like I told you last year, supporters of Rangers and TRIFC celebrate victory before the game has even kicked off. Now your celebrating next years title win before this one has even been clinched. Now Celtic may well have a few bad seasons, but the cash strapped newco are running at a loss every year, and any business that runs at a loss every year will eventually go out of business. I would have thought supporters of TRIFC PLC, or whatever the newco is calling itself these days, would know that more than anyone?

God bless SIR David Murray for that one btw.

 

[davek]

1.58 on in this.

 

[catcherintherye]

I would rather discuss the football tbh. Rangers did bad things in the past for sure. But Celtic have had their issues as well, although yes Celtic to my knowledge have never had a so called signing policy. But i don't wish to say any more on the matter, because we will all be going around in circles. I will say one final time though, that religion had nothing to do with Rangers early history. So anyway that's the last of what i wish to say about the matter.

Celtic's signing policy was that they would sign a Protestant over a Catholic if given the choice. On the basis that they could sign the Catholic later anyway, as Rangers woudn't.

There is faults with both, but they are not mirror images mate.

The Irish republicanism that Celtic subscribe too, was founded by Protestants. They've never had an issue with Protestants. They just hold the belief that Protestants and Catholics should be treated equally.

 

[catcherintherye]

1.58 on in this.

I understand we have some Rangers fans on here. I mean it's a historical for supporters of our club, but it's by the by. However how anyone can not give it up when that knobhead took charge, and they started having songs like that is beyond me.

He will go down in folklaw now as well, as the man who stopped the 10 (despite the fact he eventually came 1st in a 2 horse race at about the 9th time of asking in all comps). I don't know how any Evertonian can go along with that. Just sack them off.