Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Scottish football

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 28206
  • Start date Start date
This made me laugh lol



Hmm nah he should have been gone. Something weird at that club.

He's Lawwells favourite son, and he's won 10 league titles at Celtic, 5 as a player and 5 as a manager. Personally I've never rated him as a manager (one that should be managing Celtic), but I can understand why he's probably going to be there until the end of the season regardless of where Celtic finish.

Lennon should never have been appointed in the first place. IMO
 
This made me laugh lol





He's Lawwells favourite son, and he's won 10 league titles at Celtic, 5 as a player and 5 as a manager. Personally I've never rated him as a manager (one that should be managing Celtic), but I can understand why he's probably going to be there until the end of the season regardless of where Celtic finish.

Lennon should never have been appointed in the first place. IMO

He was meant to be a stop gap to seal the title. Club saw him as the cheap option and as per went with it. He's a Celtic legend no doubt but he should have walked away.
 

This made me laugh lol





He's Lawwells favourite son, and he's won 10 league titles at Celtic, 5 as a player and 5 as a manager. Personally I've never rated him as a manager (one that should be managing Celtic), but I can understand why he's probably going to be there until the end of the season regardless of where Celtic finish.

Lennon should never have been appointed in the first place. IMO

Too sober for Lennon........allegedly.
 
Hmm nah he should have been gone. Something weird at that club.

I reckon Celtic will be talking to managers now, and may even have reached an agreement with someone to take over at the end of the season. Should they have appointed a temporary manager when everyone knows he's only going to last a few months?
 
I reckon Celtic will be talking to managers now, and may even have reached an agreement with someone to take over at the end of the season. Should they have appointed a temporary manager when everyone knows he's only going to last a few months?
Things like that puzzle me. Why wouldn't a club want to bring a manager in (assuming he is a free agent) as early as possible so he can properly asses the squad and get bedded in before the new season starts without any pressure?

Steve Clark is now favourite ahead of Kennedy. Howe, Benitez and (worryingly) Lampard. 1 is in a role, 1 is at the club anyway and 3 are free agents.
 
Things like that puzzle me. Why wouldn't a club want to bring a manager in (assuming he is a free agent) as early as possible so he can properly asses the squad and get bedded in before the new season starts without any pressure?

Steve Clark is now favourite ahead of Kennedy. Howe, Benitez and (worryingly) Lampard. 1 is in a role, 1 is at the club anyway and 3 are free agents.

It would be better if Celtic could appoint whoever the new manager will be as soon as possible, but what if he's already in a job and refuses to do a Rodgers and walk out on the club, or country, he's managing at the moment?

One advantage with appointing a new manager in the summer would be that it might create some enthusiasm within the the support, and make more of them renew.

I've noticed Rangers tend to get their signings done pretty early on, while Celtic tend to wait until they find out if they've made the Champions League group stage before they decide who they're signing.
 


Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top