*Pray
You mean pray Matty, prey means something else, and when taken out of context, could have, ummmm, vastly negative implications for you lad!
ffs i always balls it up
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
*Pray
You mean pray Matty, prey means something else, and when taken out of context, could have, ummmm, vastly negative implications for you lad!
"I'm not paying for another manager."
Even after that, they still spent 40m net in the summer - Luis Sinisterra, Unal was another.
Last summer they spent £125m.
The summer before that £85m.
So thats £250m, net, spent by Bournemouth the past 3 years.
... by comparison, Everton are the only club in the Prem to record a positive net spend the last 5 years.
The last 4 of them years, we've recorded a profit.
Everton are also the only team in the Prem to record 3 successive summer windows making a profit.
A team, widely condemned as circling the drain.
We'll continue to do so until there's investment.
We can rant and rave at the manager, but it's ridiculous to ignore that fact.
15+ teams are in the £100m+ net spend territory - West Ham sit 6th for spend at nearly £300m. Forest 8th just short of £250m.
Our next opposition have spent nearly £600m on transfer fees alone, while Everton have made a profit.
That assumption is part of the problem.
People refuse to acknowledge the full picture if it in anyway can be interpreted as mitigation for Dyche.
Like I've said on here before Dyche, and will do if he leaves tomorrow. This Everton team are bang in trouble until it spends. Another manager might take us a few places higher, or a few places lower. But we're still down bottom half of the table when we have Mykolenko and Young at full back, with a front 3 of players who can't score goals.
Like tarks, I think he has been carrying an injury this season.
Defensively his stats last season were very good (in comparison to fullbacks in the PL.)
Compared to this season, something’s clearly changed. (Branthwaite being injured?, McNeil not in front of him? Injured?)
Last season
View attachment 283282
This season
View attachment 283284
It is a fact. We were in a relegation scrap when he signed, and we are in a relegation scrap nearly 2 years later. This is by his own admission.
I'm not shouting at clouds lad, I'm pointlessly debating with pro Dyche people like yourself that for some unknown reason are content with him.
It is possible to simultaneously hold both thoughts that he did his job and that now the job is beyond him if we want to not be perennial relegation candidates. It's what most seem to keep saying to you tbh
That was 2 years ago mate sorry, irrelevant.
Michael Balls column in the ECHO sums him up.
is it the exact same points per game? NoJust saying it is a fact doesn’t make something a fact. 15 points after 20 games. 19th place. Points per game and league position have both gone up from when he arrived even in this poor season so far. So you can keep just throwing about assertions as to what I may or may not think (most of which are wrong) but the stats don’t back you up.
But you’ve done nothing but go on about his time at Burnley 3 years ago?
Just saying it is a fact doesn’t make something a fact. 15 points after 20 games. 19th place. Points per game and league position have both gone up from when he arrived even in this poor season so far. So you can keep just throwing about assertions as to what I may or may not think (most of which are wrong) but the stats don’t back you up.
We’ve seen him have a selected handful of decent games, just like we did in the back end of Lampard’s first season when he scored that volley at Leicester, and at the start of the next season when our defence started off pretty solid.
Going back to Dyche, I think it’s extremely tough to argue that he’s improved a single one of our players as a footballer.
The next games are basically a final roll of the dice for him.
He has nothing to lose...will he go for it?