2022/23 Sean Dyche

[GrandOldTeam]

I've said before, he should've made changes. I was saying he had us set up to attack but our legs had gone.

He doesn't rate Simms. Maupay and Davies offer zero in an attacking sense.

He should've parked the bus and didn't.

He rated Simms to start him at Anfield.
He rated Maupay to start him 3 on the spin.
He rated Davies to bring him on I think what seems every game?

Legs had long gone from 60" especially for likes of Gray, and the game was far too open.

Just think he got it wrong today, he didn't do anything at 2-1 up, away from home, with 20 minutes to go to try and prevent losing.

Needed legs, desperately - Onana was woeful, Gray could barely move. Dyche froze.

 

[atypicalusername]

I think a big issue who was brought on from what was available.

I thought they were the right changes but just a little too late.

 

[ToffeeTim]

You must have been watching a different game mate. Tactically we were great. We cuased then all sorts of problems and apart from not being able to handle Brennan Johnson we literally looked comfortable all game.

If he'd have made a sub and we'd have conceded, it would have been wrong..

We will pick up more points than under Lampard with the team playing like that. We just need to get that extra runner involved when we attack as we only ever have one and it makes the eventual forward pass too predictable....

Gray was extremely tired. Onana may as well not been on the pitch. Waiting 89 mins for a sub is 1983 management not 2023.

 

[blueblood]

Think some people here are forgetting just how bad our away performances were under Lampard. In a very short space of time Dyche has organised these players and made us harder to break down. Yes, we all wanted a win today but we’d have just rolled over if that game had been played a month ago. Picking up a point away from home is a habit we need to get in to. Even after they equalised they didn’t really cause us any further problems. Am I frustrated we didn’t win? Yes. But I’d have taken a point at the start given their strong home record and our lack of striker.

 

[kenada_blue]

Well not Too Davies if you need to win the game, maybe to defend a lead, Simms/ Garner, maybe, not much I agree.

Doesn't rate Simms. Garner just back from injury. Not gonna make a huge difference

 

[mccole]

Again like Villa, Forest made 3 subs to freshen and change it up.

We could have done the same with Maupay, Davies and Garner.

Poor game management

 

[blueblood]

He rated Simms to start him at Anfield.
He rated Maupay to start him 3 on the spin.
He rated Davies to bring him on I think what seems every game?

Legs had long gone from 60" especially for likes of Gray, and the game was far too open.

Just think he got it wrong today, he didn't do anything at 2-1 up, away from home, with 20 minutes to go to try and prevent losing.

Needed legs, desperately - Onana was woeful, Gray could barely move. Dyche froze.

He’s got a chronic lack of options at the moment though. Hopefully by next week Garner will be back who would be a better option to look after the ball in midfield and Patterson would be a better option on the right of midfield if he wants to bring Iwobi off. Then the most obvious welcomed return would be DCL, but as we know that is grasping at straws at the moment.

 

[Eagle Eye]

Gray was extremely tired. Onana may as well not been on the pitch. Waiting 89 mins for a sub is 1983 management not 2023.

Agreed on the 2 players you highlight, but they had just equalised and the momentum was with them. Sometimes a change can upset the organisation and we were pretty well organised , 2 lapses aside...

 

[mahermi1]

Doesn't rate Simms. Garner just back from injury. Not gonna make a huge difference

Irony know about that Garner is far more creative and I realise he's been out a while, but 20 minutes in my view could have helped him get back up to speed and a good set piece taker to boot.

 

[GrandOldTeam]

He’s got a chronic lack of options at the moment though. Hopefully by next week Garner will be back who would be a better option to look after the ball in midfield and Patterson would be a better option on the right of midfield if he wants to bring Iwobi off. Then the most obvious welcomed return would be Dominic Calvert-Lewin, but as we know that is grasping at straws at the moment.

He didn't need to bring on quality or options to win it though mate, just legs to keep us from losing it.

He didn't do anything.

No way should Gray have been left on beyond 70th minute.

 

[MikeH72]

Has anyone at Everton football club been informed about the 5 sub rule?

 

[ToffeeTim]

Agreed on the 2 players you highlight, but they had just equalised and the momentum was with them. Sometimes a change can upset the organisation and we were pretty well organised , 2 lapses aside...

We conceded 2 goals to a side who looked toothless. We've conceded more than once in 4/6 games under Dyche - he's not doing anything differently than Lampard had done. And that's no surprise because changing manager was pointless because the manager isn't the problem

 

[ToffeeTim]

Has anyone at Everton football club been informed about the 5 sub rule?

The club still operate like its the 90s

 

[blueblood]

We conceded 2 goals to a side who looked toothless. We've conceded more than once in 4/6 games under Dyche - he's not doing anything differently than Lampard had done. And that's no surprise because changing manager was pointless because the manager isn't the problem

I agree to an extent that the quality of the players is the major issue, but I don’t agree that if Lampard was managing that game we’d have come away with a point. We’d have been far more open and been picked off easily.

 

[Terrarian]

When your players insist on gifting the opposition goals every game, what is he supposed to do. They work hard but are severely lacking in talent.