Having a brief look at his transfers there's definitely some that fall into that category and some even older. But there's also younger ones that Burnley sold on for healthy profit so much like your statement that Ashley Young starts EVERY game it appears to be a not entirely accurate definition. Playing 27 games, some as starter, is you must admit quite different to your original assertion.
I'm not gonna sit and analyse every substitution, how that particular match was going and optimal substitution strategies as that would likely involve having to sit and watch the games in full again for anything like a clear and accurate idea. A ridiculously involved endeavour I'd hope you'd agree. I'd be foolish to do it based on memory as you've already quite clearly demonstrated that the memory can hold false truths in regards to accurate specifics.
Perhaps a transfer policy based solely along the lines of Chermiti type deals would be beneficial but there's no demonstrable way of knowing that is there?
Not sure where you get the idea that I'm 'enjoying' this or that I believe we/Everton 'deserve' whatever this is now to be truthful. Saying that Dyche is doing a decent job given the current situation at the club and for the meantime seems a sensible if conservative choice until the club as a whole enters more stable waters isn't a glowing endorsement or a statement of long term ambition. There's a degree of hyperbole in how you're responding to it.
Since January I've posted in here (by which I mean this particular thread) not many times but definitely had done so before the derby win. About as regularly as before January I'd imagine but I haven't done the sums. It's just that sometimes it seems a little pointless having the same exchanges when the replies are often based on entirely made-up statements rather than accurate rebuttals containing actual facts.
There are other parts of the site, and subjects, I find more enjoyable, relaxed and less pointlessly hostile. That's where I've been 'hiding' since January.
First off I said he's played everywhere except CB and ST, not every game - however as already pointed out he's played in nearly every game he's been available for anyway, regardless of how crap his form is or in general what the situation is. Weird that you've hopped on that as some overanalytical point, but to reiterate:
His track record is of "EXPERIENCED" players - he brought in Young to be an experienecd and cool head, played him at left back, he was atrocious, he's played everywhere except as a striker or CB since and had literally 2 good games.
Yeah, he didn't - he still did the previous 5 or so as well as having to be shoehorned in in various positions, especially when chasing a result and we need someone to run at them, instead of anyone younger or who can actually run.
Second off - he was brought in as a left back, which is where he was instantly slotted and was horrid before leaving that to an actual left back (similar to how for 4 games Branthwaite "wasn't ready" and Keane was playing). Since then he's been tried at right mid, centre mid, right back - all but 2 games, literally, he's been a net negative. He got us a penalty by whining, fair enough, and did okay once more recently, but he's picked up red cards, fouls, done poorly many more times and in costlier situations. Hell, even against Forest he was a walking penalty kick for them, but luckily the ref was from Luton or something or the other.
Anyway, "Chermiti type deals" is what we should go for but Dyche is hellbent on "earning a chance", whatever this means, so the same Chermiti types play 1 to 10 min a month, tops, which is utterly pointless. This isn't giving a player a chance - it's being stubborn.
He did walk into some good players during his 10+ years, Branthwaite included, but they also had to sit out long periods of time for no reason as experienced players had already "proven" their "experience", no doubt (not gonna bother finding a quote, but the man has said the exact same thing for years ffs - "experienced", "we gave it/did our best", "the fans were great") - McNeil is a player people point out often; the same McNeil played literally 1 minute of football in his first year at Burnley, then 80 minutes over half a season (in 1 game) before being given an actual fair chance; Keane was less as he was loaned in for 6 months before making it permanent and featuring more, and so on. Trippier was mentioned recently too, which is a great point - he was playing some fantastic stuff in the Championship and getting assists and goals but in the Prem he was instantly unable to go past the half way line, which is... well, the same as Dyche sets up now.
Point is, unless it's some generational talent or an instantly good enough player - he won't be playing any time soon. This is backed by Dyche himself admitting he sees no potential in anyone from the youth team. I don't want us to give him any kind of money and we shouldn't be surprised when we inevitably do (as we won't sack him) and he gets us a bunch of shockingly limited but tall players in their prime (26-29) and a bunch of 33+ free transfers, for the experience.
I got the idea you're enjoying Dyche's reign because of your avatar of Dyche with the hearts and all lol and because you've come back to defending him because we've won 2 games. We can't keep ignoring half the season being dire because of an obvious purple patch which started with a fluke of a goal vs Burnley as we could've played for 400 more minutes and didn't look like scoring.