Bungle
Player Valuation: £90m
Nope.
I wasn't talking to you, pipe down you weasel.
Nope.
I think it does or you're going to see a lot of players sent off for completely unintentional accidents.
Look at the clips of Kane again. On the first and last incidents he looks directly at the player and not the ball. He knows exactly where they are and what he's going to do.
There's no rule that says you have to get out of the players way so they can challenge for the ball. You're allowed to occupy space in between a player and the ball.
The question becomes whether the action to duck out of the challenge is one to protect themselves or to injure another player and I don't think both situations should be getting treated the same.
You have won a few games in the last month or so woop de doo, chill ya beans you will still be miles off the top come end of season..Instead of other teams, shouldn't that be Everton?
You have won a few games in the last month or so woop de doo, chill ya beans you will still be miles off the top come end of season..
get back to ya spurs forum or go n shine daniel levys head for him or suttin useful
Do you know if this @H.H. fella is a poster on the Spurs forum? He strikes me as one of them that gets told to [Poor language removed] wherever he contributes, be it opposition or Spurs forums.
HH stands for Harry Hotspur surely ?No idea. There is no poster with that user name. He would probably fit in quite well, it's a madhouse.
Son or Kane?Muck like us, Spurs are one injury away from being bang average.
Not so much for the football its a hate for patronising peopleI agree, I've always said that Spurs will be well away from your neighbours and Man City and I would be great very the moon if we could sneak a top 4 place.
P.S. It's a shame that you have so much hate, it's only a game.
HH stands for Harry Hotspur surely ?
Or Lloris or either centre half.Son or Kane?
Not so much for the football its a hate for patronising people
No idea. There is no poster with that user name. He would probably fit in quite well, it's a madhouse.
There's no doubt when you see the replays that there is intent, he's not standing his ground or ducking the challenge, he looks then backs into the player looking for the foul yet being wreckless as to whether the opponent gets injured or not, a straight red for me.Well I'm saying that the rules should be changed so yes there is not currently one but that's sort of the issue.
To me very rarely is a player doing something intentionally dangerous. Most red cards for bad tackles the intent is mostly to win the ball. Not always but mostly. It can still be red without intent. Same with these imo.
Loads of hackers and scams about atm round xmas bad time for itIn that case someone must keep hacking your log-in cos you have often said that you hate everything Spurs (and it may have been you who said it was because you once got terrorised at WHL?)