Suarez's Punishment

[obc]

167 people won money betting that Suarez would bite someone during the World Cup.

Think about that.

Think anyone put money on ANYONE else biting someone?

 

[Garrick]

So here's a question.

Let's say he gets banned from football for a period of time. Are the RS still obligated to pay his wages?

 

[Kiwi]

So here's a question.

Let's say he gets banned from football for a period of time. Are the RS still obligated to pay his wages?

if they aren't prepared to sue for breach of contract probably yes. Can't see them getting their money back unless say he had good behaviour clauses worked into his contract. Perhaps some kind of insurance policy on Sewer Rat but I have no idea whether one they have one and two whether it could cover something like that.

 

[ilikecheese]

So here's a question.

Let's say he gets banned from football for a period of time. Are the RS still obligated to pay his wages?

if they aren't prepared to sue for breach of contract probably yes. Can't see them getting their money back unless say he had good behaviour clauses worked into his contract. Perhaps some kind of insurance policy on Sewer Rat but I have no idea whether one they have one and two whether it could cover something like that.

Probably cost them more to go the litigation route...Mutu and Chelsea were in court for years.

 

[TheFinnFan]

Have a look at RAWK...locked up threads everywhere! HILARIOUS that their members are basically being told not to talk about it.

Cult at work.

 

[ilikecheese]

Cult at work.

Indeed mate. Their members were instructed to post all things Suarez in their group thread on their World Cup forum. Then they locked the group thread after everyone only wanted to talk about Suarez.

Too funny. Basically they are saying that Suarez biting folks will not be talked about on their site. It's kind of a big deal...

 

[TheFinnFan]

If he would have tried to stab some one in the pitch, and. missed, these people would be like "theres no cut marks anywhere . No ban!"

 

[Blueblooded]

He's a danger to his fellow professionals, he's exhibited it for years (heel-raking, back-stamping, eye-gouging, hair-pulling, stomach kicking, basically whatever he thinks he can get away with, usually followed by feigning injury). That's not even touching on his other propensities (diving, racism, handball, card-waving etc).

Anything less than a ban from ALL football after his THIRD unprovoked biting incident would be a joke.

And yes, both Uruguay and LFC deserve to lose out because both have indulged and enabled the cheating, snidey toe-rag.

EDITING to say: Whenever he does get back on the pitch and next sets out to injure a fellow pro (which he WILL), I hope his intended victim turns round and volleys his teeth down his throat. It would be the most fitting punishment imaginable.

 

[rascal]

Is there a more stupid argument than he only bit someone and did not break a leg?

 

[Moomin]

Is there a more stupid argument than he only bit someone and did not break a leg?

In passionate love making, a little bite can be sensual. He was just reacting to the sexual defending from the Italian hunk. I blame the skin tight tops the Italian was wearing.

 

[macdog]

I've been amusing myself imagining him trying a stunt like that on Duncan Ferguson.

 

[Tommy Chong]

Cult at work.

 

[ToffeeDan]

I bring you what could be good news

The independent disciplinary panel, chaired by Swiss lawyer Claudio Sulser, has a range of sanctions available up to 24-match ban or a two-year suspension from all football.

The good news is that Claudio Sulser was an (excellent) striker back in the day - played for Switzerland - and, hopefully, he gets it.

 

[ToffeeDan]

http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2014/jun/25/luis-suarez-giorgio-chiellini-violence-deceit

Game Set Match.

 

[The Cowboy]

Sure I read yesterday that Suarez's agent is also a board member for the Uruguayan FA. Got to be some sort of conflict of interest here?