Not in the last few days no, but it was widely reported in the January window and again in March/April time that he was a target.
So before we got a completely different guy in to do the transfers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not in the last few days no, but it was widely reported in the January window and again in March/April time that he was a target.
THIS.Vardy would be a bad signing. He's virtually entirely reliant on his pace and once it goes, he's done.
He's also not going to get much rest over the summer as he's off to the World Cup with England and played virtually every match for Leicester since they were promoted, so could struggle next season due to fatigue.
He's also characteristic of the poor signings made by Walsh and Koeman. Older, 'proven' players signed for big money, on big wages who just don't perform.
Exactly he could replace RooneyVardy would be a bad signing. He's virtually entirely reliant on his pace and once it goes, he's done.
He's also not going to get much rest over the summer as he's off to the World Cup with England and played virtually every match for Leicester since they were promoted, so could struggle next season due to fatigue.
He's also characteristic of the poor signings made by Walsh and Koeman. Older, 'proven' players signed for big money, on big wages who just don't perform.
Assume that was a joke, but no one is joining Burnley due to an ambition to play European football, on the basis of one quite possibly never to be repeated 7th place finish.
I actually think Rose is the type of signing that would make people sit up and take notice. Englands first choice left back, twice named in the PFA team of the year and a regular for a Spurs side which has been one of the leagues most consistent sides for the last few years. I was genuinely surprised when I saw him linked with us so I'm pretty sure the wider world would be.
Despite all that, i'm not sure that dropping £30m+ on a left back is going to solve too many of our problems so I don't know if it's a goer.
As I said above, I was just saying that it wasn't a completely irrelevant discussion in the transfer thread, seeing as we had been strongly linked with him over recent months. Also worth pointing out that it's been an open secret that Brands was coming for at least 2 months now, and there have been other names mentioned (Fabra for example) who people believe would be a Brands signing, despite the links starting way before we announced him.So before we got a completely different guy in to do the transfers?
Not ideal, spending £30m + on an another older player.And....?
It certainly is to championship player.kidding yourself if you think it isn't a selling point
Danny Rose is Englands No 1 left back and at his peak. He won't be coming here whether we're willing to spend big money on him or not. He'll be waiting for United to make him an offer and i'd imagine will be quite happy to use our name to smoke them out.Danny Rose is injury prone.
He's getting to age 28 and had injury issues thoroughout his career.
Big swerve on that.
In the most respectful way possible, if you can see through his strategy, do you really think it will fool the bloke who United pay £2.5m a year to sort out their transfers?Danny Rose is Englands No 1 left back and at his peak. He won't be coming here whether we're willing to spend big money on him or not. He'll be waiting for United to make him an offer and i'd imagine will be quite happy to use our name to smoke them out.
I had him down as injury prone as well but it looks like he's only had one really big injury in about 5 yearsDanny Rose is injury prone.
He's getting to age 28 and had injury issues thoroughout his career.
Big swerve on that.
Taken in the most respectful way possible.In the most respectful way possible, if you can see through his strategy, do you really think it will fool the bloke who United pay £2.5m a year to sort out their transfers?