Theoretically I agree with you, but we can’t have it both ways.I sincerely hope that Tierney honours his words and remains at Celtic. It is always heartening when a talented footballer spurns obscene financial remuneration to play the sport he loves for the club he supports. The moment he reneges on that promise he becomes just another overpaid, pot chasing young man of dubious fidelity,which I find sad.
I think many of us on here have become jaundiced in our views of footballers professions of support in the wake of the series of dishonourable scoundrels who have passed through our club ranks in recent years. Entirely understandable.
People go on (and on) about mentality, and winners, and NSNO, so we all need to want to be the absolute best. Players like osman and Hibbert are ‘stealing a living’ and having ex players as coaches is just ‘jobs for the boys’. But then when someone like stones or lukaku or Barkley or fellaini or whoever decides they’d actually quite like to win something and play with better players and coaches, they’re horrible turncoats and if they had anything about them they’d stay and make us better.
I can see both sides. If (big if) tierney is as good as people say, is staying at Celtic to be applauded on a loyalty basis, or derided as a player who won’t challenge himself or move outside his comfort zone? Not straightforward in my opinion.