paulashcroftefc
Player Valuation: £8m
If Mirallas signs extension Im very suprised
1 year max I would say.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Mirallas signs extension Im very suprised
If reports are to be believed, West Ham have beaten us to Ogbonna and Stoke have beaten us to Shaqiri. Lol.
I would be shocked but then again I never expected Garbutt to sign. If Mirallas stays and we get Mertens I would be happy.If Mirallas signs extension Im very suprised
Stoke must be offering huge wages and signing on fees. That's why they were linked with Konoplyanka aswell. Shaqiri has apparently turned Stoke down though.I can actually understand the West Ham one from a 'footballing mercenary' perspective, and if Ogbonna does go there then it shows his mentality for what it is and it's a bullet dodged as far as I'm concerned.
Shaqiri has me utterly baffled though. Can't understand that one at all.
I can actually understand the West Ham one from a 'footballing mercenary' perspective, and if Ogbonna does go there then it shows his mentality for what it is and it's a bullet dodged as far as I'm concerned.
Shaqiri has me utterly baffled though. Can't understand that one at all.
I would be shocked but then again I never expected Garbutt to sign. If Mirallas stays and we get Mertens I would be happy.
Isn't it against the rules to post something about another thread?I think this thread is working quite well, but the other not so much.
So many warnings, so many non-mods policing, so much jarg and off topic. So little credibility.
Can we have more thread banning there please? The message doesn't seem to getting through.
And I posted this here, so as not to be hypocritical in the other thread...
And can I say the mods are doing a great and thankless job, let's make it easier for them.
to;dr no more warnings please.
WE ARE NOT IN FOR SHAQIRI.
IT WAS AN AGENT/CLUB SPREADING A YARN TO PUSH STOKE INTO HURRYING UP AND MAKING A BID
If reports are to be believed, West Ham have beaten us to Ogbonna and Stoke have beaten us to Shaqiri. Lol.
The link said Stoke offered Shaqiri 60K a week.Stoke must be offering huge wages and signing on fees. That's why they were linked with Konoplyanka aswell. Shaqiri has apparently turned Stoke down though.
So why was it published after Stoke had made the bid and it had been accepted?WE ARE NOT IN FOR SHAQIRI.
IT WAS AN AGENT/CLUB SPREADING A YARN TO PUSH STOKE INTO HURRYING UP AND MAKING A BID
WE ARE NOT IN FOR SHAQIRI.
IT WAS AN AGENT/CLUB SPREADING A YARN TO PUSH STOKE INTO HURRYING UP AND MAKING A BID
I wouldn't want any 1 year extension. Either a 3 or 4 year deal or nothing.A Bunch of Moody Belgians might not be as good as it sounds