Probably agree here, now do you want that exciting player to be a winger or more of a Silva etc. type player?
Ronny doesnt play a Silva type mate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably agree here, now do you want that exciting player to be a winger or more of a Silva etc. type player?
Ronny doesnt play a Silva type mate.
Would you throw Giroud in to that mix for a season or two ?He looks a good player mate, if we could get him in I wouldnt be against it, I just think we should go for an older player to replace Lukaku, potential wont score goals.
Fair enough, who would you suggest then?
Didn't he want Mata......
Your post just confirms my point. And as I said there's nothing wrong with being the way we are. Its pure football snobbery and I'm proud of it.We should be looking down our nose at these clubs. Put together they haven't won half as many league titles as Everton have. The media and the monopoly the sh1te have over it have done a wonderful job in forgetting Everton's importance in English football. Everton had more title's then Manchester utd when football was invented in 1993.
Mata would have played LW, if we even had any interest at all, lets not forget there was only ever 1 person who said we had interest in Mata.
He does play a "playmaker", if Sigi is bought he will probably favour the left wing, thats where I think our playmaker will play.
I could be very wrong, but heres how I think we will set up.
4-3-3
2 wingbacks up and down all day, they will provide the width
1 sitting DM
2 box to box midfielders
1 player on the right wing who will be asked to tuck in alongside the fella at top and play almost as a SS
1 player on the left who will be given a free role and expected to drift all along the space in the hole and pull the strings
1 "number 9" who will be expected to score goals, hold the ball up and be an attacking hub
The whole team will be expected to press the ball at all times.
Thats my take anyway.
Would you throw Giroud in to that mix for a season or two ?
Fair enough,
I'll trust whatever he does but I hope we look away from Sigi and buy someone who can create from open play.
Giroud, horrible face aside, would be perfect for the system I suspect Ronny wishes to play.
Giroud, horrible face aside, would be perfect for the system I suspect Ronny wishes to play.
Well I would take a chance on Ghezzal myself, not the greatest 12months and there must be questions regarding his hunger, but hes got La Magica.
I think koeman wants pace across the board, Giroud is one of the slowest forwards in the league (makes barry look speedy
Think Sandro, and if we got someone like Dembele could learn a lot from the likes of him and hopefully, Henry now that he has signed will be watching from afar in Belgium.Giroud, horrible face aside, would be perfect for the system I suspect Ronny wishes to play.
lol lol lol I just think Dembele could do a job mate .MAYBE not a STARTER but better thane Kone/Valencia on the bench.
Mata would have played LW, if we even had any interest at all, lets not forget there was only ever 1 person who said we had interest in Mata.
He does play a "playmaker", if Sigi is bought he will probably favour the left wing, thats where I think our playmaker will play.
I could be very wrong, but heres how I think we will set up.
4-3-3
2 wingbacks up and down all day, they will provide the width
1 sitting DM
2 box to box midfielders
1 player on the right wing who will be asked to tuck in alongside the fella at top and play almost as a SS
1 player on the left who will be given a free role and expected to drift all along the space in the hole and pull the strings
1 "number 9" who will be expected to score goals, hold the ball up and be an attacking hub
The whole team will be expected to press the ball at all times.
Thats my take anyway.