I don't disagree with you one bit. The fact is if our net spend is 50m - that is the equivalent of Pickford and Keane. We've actually used the Lukaku funds to sign 3 number 9's, we went way to hard on Sigurdsson IMO. That focus should have been directed at a proven striker. Either that or we shouldn't have jumped on Klaassen so early.
We have much more fund than before but of course not unlimited.
And please dont forget we have paid more to buy sig and received less from barkley(even 30-35m)
RK and the board put the 1st priority to buy the replacement of Barkley and it seems make sense.
Thus, we may only have 20-30M to buy the striker and probably found that this money only can buy same level as DCL/SANDRO in current market.
Now, we will probably receive nothing from Barkley. I am quite worried if the board will invest much more to buy striker or not.