windymiller
Player Valuation: £60m
No. Sadly.Are saying we won’t do what I have said ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. Sadly.Are saying we won’t do what I have said ?
Yep - if you throw enough scientists and coaches with degrees at the game it will become more technical. City for example clearly play an almost different sport to our 80s title winning sides.Again, it's an oversimplification. I agree that phrases like turnovers are just a semantics change. But closing down was often disorganised. There is so much game analysis now that good clubs study for pressing triggers - e.g. when to close down, otherwise you are all over the place.
People like to make out that football isn't more technical now, but it is. That's not to say that the basic elements aren't the same.
And I still get royally annoyed by missing basics like stopping the cross etc.
All three have taken clubs down.There’s a reason the likes of Roy Hodgson, Sean Dyche, Neil Warnock etc are able to come in to clubs who are struggling and are able to get good results.
Football these days have been made to seem a lot more complicated and technical than it needs to be, partly because the people consuming and running the game has changed massively. It used to be a much more working class, simple game. Nowadays there’s loads of middle class, rich, highly educated people who are applying their depth of knowledge to the game and making it so much more complex. There are obvious benefits to this - especially in terms of sports science and player welfare etc. but there’s also a hell of a lot of fluff and nonsense - overly technical and trendy terms for making it sound like the game has evolved hugely when in fact people have just relabelled something that was always done in the game with a more modern and trendy word.
Eg -
“pressing” = closing down
“turnovers”/“breakdowns” = giving the chuffing ball away
“Aerial Duels” = headers
“Progressive passing” = playing it forwards
The likes of Dyche get stick partly because they just keep it simple and use the older terminology for stuff that everyone still does under rebadged and trendier names.
Lampard was very much “new school” - constantly talking about “the idea” and using all this modern terminology. Dyche came in and kept things very much more simple and got us out of trouble.
If he thinks this style of pre season works best for this absolutely useless bunch of modern millionaire footballers, he has my blessing.
We will sign players, it is obvious. I have only got one window wrong - the last one, prior to that - always right.Yes, it is likely we will sign a couple more free agents but it's also "obvious" that we'll see more departures. Are you confident that our squad will be better than last year's at
1. The Fulham game
2. The end of the window
Neither are "obvious" to anyone else. You've been horribly wrong for two of the last four windows so just saying things are "obvious" with no other explanation other than your blind optimism is redundant.
That's literally our only good performance in 2 years. When we do that more than once it can be used as evidence, reproducibility is key.Yep - if you throw enough scientists and coaches with degrees at the game it will become more technical. City for example clearly play an almost different sport to our 80s title winning sides.
But because as you say the basic elements are the same it is possible to simplify the game and focus on doing those basic building blocks really really well and have decent success. And that includes working players hard and getting them really fit.
The Brighton away game is your perfect example of that. It’s was a triumph of running really fast at the right moments.
All three have taken clubs down.
I see your sticking with just saying things are "obvious" without explanation. Just repeating it over and over like some sort of mantra. There really isn't much else to say then. You clearly see yourself as some sort of Christ-like figure, which fits your nonsensical persona.We will sign players, it is obvious. I have only got one window wrong - the last one, prior to that - always right.
Didnt you say we were going down?
Obviously we should be targeting getting as many in as soon as possible to have them ready for the opening game but last year was a slightly different case because with the early start due to the WC we had 5 fixtures prior to the window closing whereas this season it's 3.There will be signings, what we don’t want is a yet another repeat of going into the opening games of the season with doubts and discussions dominating the lack of incomings as each game passes. Last year in particular was a disgrace and gross negligence.
I'm sure his wife would be jumping with joy with that possibilityWould you take vardy on a two year contract?
All three have taken clubs down.
They keep getting employed because clubs lack imagination. The same way Allardyce keeps getting jobs.And yet keep getting employed because more often than not they take teams up/keep them up
No mate! I say it is obvious cos it really is! We have let lots of players go and were short already. Whether loans or whatever we will sign players. Now, get back to your constant doom life you seem to revel in.I see your sticking with just saying things are "obvious" without explanation. Just repeating it over and over like some sort of mantra. There really isn't much else to say then. You clearly see yourself as some sort of Christ-like figure, which fits your nonsensical persona.
Keane now proving a double liability..
Preferably some 20 year old we've never heard of from Japan or South Korea