BluenosePaul
Banned at own request
You're all forgetting the £20-25m we 'may' have to spend will include signing on fees, agent fees + wages. No way can we spend £20m on one player.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I doubt we'd be paying 100% up front anyway mate. Didn't Kenwright once say "you don't need £10 million to buy an £10 million player"? Or was that moyes?You're all forgetting the £20-25m we 'may' have to spend will include signing on fees, agent fees + wages. No way can we spend £20m on one player.
Why would you be concerned?25 mill to spend????
There is absolutley no chance in the world we will spend 25 mill in the summer - i would be amazed and slightly concerned.
Why would you be concerned?
I'd spend it.
Go for it, if we get an absolutely ace starting 11 we're more likely to hit CL than if we try to have a solid, but not great squad. We desperately need a striker and the lot across the park show how having great strikers can make up for weakness in the squad.
I'd rather get a top (or potentially top) forward than 2 solid forwards.
If we only get to spend 25 million this summer then the pressure must intensify on the board this summer, like Martinez said we are +13m in transfers in his time and Kenwright promised him 'a few quid' to spend last summer which given our negative spend wasn't needed and then add to that this summers 'few quid' we should easily have 35 to spend.
I doubt we'd be paying 100% up front anyway mate. Didn't Kenwright once say "you don't need £10 million to buy an £10 million player"? Or was that moyes?
Is Lukaku worth 25 mill? It was my post way back that brought this figure up from the quote in the mirror. Sit back all for the moment and think where did that Rag get the figure from? One cannot trust paper stories and they with the Sun were also pushing Spurs interest which has to said today was denied by Chelsea.
The thing that bugs me is, they Bought him for £18m, not all upfront, some upfront and rest based on performance related bonus's but he's hardly played enough games or scored enough goals for Chelsea for them to be forking out more of the fee they agreed with Anderlecht, so in theory who ever buys Lukaku will be paying Anderlecht for Chelsea aswell as lining there pockets!
Surely, if those performance payments apply to games he plays only at Chelsea, then the next club doesn't have to take those payments? If the case is like that, then most certainly his games for West Brom and Everton must have triggered the clauses. He's been performing regularly for belgium as well, like. Surely we'll be rid of any clauses Anderlecht have if we take him on a perm.