It's all kicking off here. But I for one would like to see Robin and Neo take this to a new thread. As far as I can see, we're getting into whether language can be taken in any direction that one desires, or whether, as Robin mentions, there are rules which language relies on for its existence.
I avoided doing philosophy of language at college merely because it looked so hard (I think I did something on old Socrates instead). But I can tell you that it is a fascinating area and one in which every position taken has been attacked by credible thinkers.
I think we might have a realism V. anti-realism debate, boys.
Oh, and Robin, I think you you went too far with Basil. If you look at the majority of his posts, I think you will agree that his grasp of English is actually very good.
But that Gazza was ace, mate! Best since Best (hehe)!