It doesn't. Plenty of us work hard but don't live in properties worth over 2m.
You're obviously not working hard enough mate
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It doesn't. Plenty of us work hard but don't live in properties worth over 2m.
It's a funny old time and no mistake. It used to be that parties would clamour for the centre ground as it was usually that which won elections. This time round though Labour have veered left because of the Greens and SNP, whilst the Tories have veered right because of UKIP.
The only vaguely centrist party (LibDems) have been hammered in the polls. Not sure it's at all healthy for things to be so polarised. Hopefully it's just for show and they agree on much more than they're letting on.
Then levy a tax on when they sell it then, not because of where it is.
I personally think it's about time parties stopped occupying the centre ground. At least there is something to differentiate between.
Or even better, increase a tax on folks that buy homes for that value if you must do something in that area.
NilWhat's the likelihood of one party winning the election without a coalition of some sort?
Bruce, stamp duty land tax is already 12% at the highest level for residential property.
The council tax bands need moving to a higher plane for houses over 1 5 million - to the maximum height its rediculous that a posh studio flat in London pays the same council tax of a mansion with an acre of land!And that is one of the flaws in the policy. With Balls running around saying it will raise £2b and he will spend this on this and that, he cant actually force people to sell a house can he?
So it is a stupid policy if the idea is to raise real money to spend on real things.
What's the likelihood of one party winning the election without a coalition of some sort?
What's the likelihood of one party winning the election without a coalition of some sort?
Ok. Two similar families work hard and buy a nice house. Not mega rich, but comfortable.
One buys a 3 bed semi in, say, Reading. One buys a 3 bed semi in say Preston.
10 years later, whilst doing similar jobs, and earning similar amounts of money, why should one pay a tax on the value of his house, and the other one shouldnt?
Dont get the logic nor fairness of it.
And that is one of the flaws in the policy. With Balls running around saying it will raise £2b and he will spend this on this and that, he cant actually force people to sell a house can he?
So it is a stupid policy if the idea is to raise real money to spend on real things.
The council tax bands need moving to a higher plane for houses over 1 5 million - to the maximum height its rediculous that a posh studio flat in London pays the same council tax of a mansion with an acre of land!