Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

The 2015 Popularity Contest (aka UK General Election )

Who will you be voting for?

  • Tory

    Votes: 38 9.9%
  • Diet Tory (Labour)

    Votes: 132 34.3%
  • Tory Zero (Greens)

    Votes: 44 11.4%
  • Extra Tory with lemon (UKIP)

    Votes: 40 10.4%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 9 2.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 31 8.1%
  • Cheese on toast

    Votes: 91 23.6%

  • Total voters
    385
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I've worked in unis since I was 19 and all I can say is there ain't many working class kids there, in my experience.

Nor should there be, really. I don't really approve of Uni education, it ain't worth it.

Oh and that Brennan is a ginger class traitor.
 
I've worked in unis since I was 19 and all I can say is there ain't many working class kids there, in my experience.

I was lucky - I went when you got a grant. My dad was a milkman and mum worked in an industrial kitchen so I'm pretty sure that, if the current regulations were in place, we'd have sat down at the time and concluded that it was too much of a debt to take on and I've have had to pursue something else. Dunno where I'd be right now without that commitment to universal education.

Frankly, I'm completely aghast that I'm having to even justify my views on this thread. I'd have thought it was obvious - tuition fees discriminate against the poor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlE
I was lucky - I went when you got a grant. My dad was a milkman and mum worked in an industrial kitchen so I'm pretty sure that, if the current regulations were in place, we'd have sat down at the time and concluded that it was too much of a debt to take on and I've have had to pursue something else. Dunno where I'd be right now without that commitment to universal education.

Frankly, I'm completely aghast that I'm having to even justify my views on this thread. I'd have thought it was obvious - tuition fees discriminate against the poor.

Quite simply because the new system is better for the poorest students and graduates. If you're from a poorer background you can receive government grants to cover tuition fees up to £3,400. Any University which wants to charge £9,000 will also have to offer another bursary to the poorest students.

If for example, your household income is less than £25,000, you will receive £3,400 per year from the government towards your tuition. The University of Liverpool, as an example, will then pay you a further £2,000 towards your tuition fees.

That means the total you owe for tuition will be £3,600 per year.

But that's not all. The new system also means you don't pay back your student loan until you're earning £21,000, rather than the old entry of £15,000. That means not only is there great support for those with the poorest parents, but graduates who don't start out on a great salary upon leaving University will also have an easier time of it.

The new system is more of a graduate tax than a traditional loan, and unless you're from a relatively high income family and then go on to earn an above average salary you'll actually notice very little difference from the current system, and may well be better off.

The only reason kids from poor backgrounds would be put off by the new system is from a lack of information and education on the subject. Anybody who takes ten minutes to look at the facts (not the spin), will see that.
 
Too many people have degrees, they're incredibly expensive and mostly worthless.

Government has slashed funding for universities, which means they're a) the most expensive they've ever been, b) don't provide as good a service and c) the degrees are at their least prestigious because of the vast number of graduates in recent years.

Shell game, don't fall for it. You'll be stuck paying back your uni for the rest of your miserable life.

The best way to win is to not play.
 

I was lucky - I went when you got a grant. My dad was a milkman and mum worked in an industrial kitchen so I'm pretty sure that, if the current regulations were in place, we'd have sat down at the time and concluded that it was too much of a debt to take on and I've have had to pursue something else. Dunno where I'd be right now without that commitment to universal education.

Frankly, I'm completely aghast that I'm having to even justify my views on this thread. I'd have thought it was obvious - tuition fees discriminate against the poor.

This system doesn't really mate. I mean, I'm a nice leftie most of the time, Labour supporter at the forthcoming election, and a student.

HOWEVER, the tuition fee system is mostly well thought through, although I have several criticisms, but first:
  • Coming to university has cost me £0 upfront
  • The loans and grants I get, coming from a poorer background, are enough to live on
  • I do not have to pay anything until I'm earning at the threshold - and on the threshold you're talking about £30 per month, after £21k or whatever it is
  • There is just no way I could be priced out, or my family, there is no debt burden unless you are earning decent money.
The system actually benefits those of us from a poorer background, because those from a better off background get less in terms of grants and loans. It is not enough to live on, and if your parents do not support you - for whatever reason - you are stuck.

Other criticisms are that:
  • While there will be no trouble repaying it, £9k is not value for money on every course
  • The state will ultimately lose money when so few pay it back in its entirety.
There is just no way you could be priced out of uni because of a low family income at present.
 
I was lucky - I went when you got a grant. My dad was a milkman and mum worked in an industrial kitchen so I'm pretty sure that, if the current regulations were in place, we'd have sat down at the time and concluded that it was too much of a debt to take on and I've have had to pursue something else. Dunno where I'd be right now without that commitment to universal education.

Frankly, I'm completely aghast that I'm having to even justify my views on this thread. I'd have thought it was obvious - tuition fees discriminate against the poor.

I really don't understand why you think tuition fees discriminate against the poor? If anything, people from poorer backgrounds receive more grants.
 
This system doesn't really mate. I mean, I'm a nice leftie most of the time, Labour supporter at the forthcoming election, and a student.

HOWEVER, the tuition fee system is mostly well thought through, although I have several criticisms, but first:
  • Coming to university has cost me £0 upfront
  • The loans and grants I get, coming from a poorer background, are enough to live on
  • I do not have to pay anything until I'm earning at the threshold - and on the threshold you're talking about £30 per month, after £21k or whatever it is
  • There is just no way I could be priced out, or my family, there is no debt burden unless you are earning decent money.
The system actually benefits those of us from a poorer background, because those from a better off background get less in terms of grants and loans. It is not enough to live on, and if your parents do not support you - for whatever reason - you are stuck.

Other criticisms are that:
  • While there will be no trouble repaying it, £9k is not value for money on every course
  • The state will ultimately lose money when so few pay it back in its entirety.
There is just no way you could be priced out of uni because of a low family income at present.

Good post mate.

This is what it's all about, being able to fairly critique the policies of every party.

The Lib Dems played a blinder in that even though they were forced to go along with raising the fees the system that was eventually introduced is great for the poorest and only costs more if you end up getting a really high paying job.
 
Good post mate.

This is what it's all about, being able to fairly critique the policies of every party.

The Lib Dems played a blinder in that even though they were forced to go along with raising the fees the system that was eventually introduced is great for the poorest and only costs more if you end up getting a really high paying job.

The LD's took a hard time over this one - although yeah, fair enough, they broke a vow, but it is a fairly good system. Faults need ironing out like.

It's a brilliant system from my point of view, just the one major criticism - my girlfriend struggles because her parents are in the highest income band, however they have seven children, three at university, and cannot just top up her income. The system does not take that into account! She will amass personal debt while she is at university and that is an issue.
 
The LD's took a hard time over this one - although yeah, fair enough, they broke a vow, but it is a fairly good system. Faults need ironing out like.

It's a brilliant system from my point of view, just the one major criticism - my girlfriend struggles because her parents are in the highest income band, however they have seven children, three at university, and cannot just top up her income. The system does not take that into account! She will amass personal debt while she is at university and that is an issue.

Her dad shouldn't have been such a sex god ffs...
 

I've never moved to the right. I have strong social feelings and beliefs towards helping those who are not as fortunate and they have never changed, but we differ on how that can be achieved.........for me the destination is the same, merely the route taken may differ........
You seem happy to take the route which is impossible for the impoverished. You are leaving many fellow countrymen behind to struggle with the journey whilst the state assist those who were already finding the journey a breeze.

Unfortunately it would appear that you have lost site of where we are all going. You're following the path of the nation making as much money as possible rather the one of humanity.
 
The answer to this is a few pages back. The number of people going has increased because the universities have made more places available. The number of people applying has decreased markedly.

Categorically untrue.

The gap between the numbers of rich and poor students applying to university has narrowed, with disadvantaged teenagers more likely than ever before to want to enrol.

New figures, published by admissions service Ucas, show that the application rates of 18-year-olds living in poor areas in all four countries of the UK have increased to the highest levels recorded.

Overall, there was a 2% increase in applications, compared to the same point last year, with 592,290 people applying.

Among UK applicants, there was a 1% rise, according to Ucas. In England alone, the number applying was also up 1%.

http://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jan/30/low-income-students-likely-apply-university-ucas
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top