Oh, don't get me wrong, I am not moaning about the barriers to entry. I am simply stating that they are there, but they exist in the form of living costs, not fees.
Wasn't disagreeing with you mate, just thought it went well with your post
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, don't get me wrong, I am not moaning about the barriers to entry. I am simply stating that they are there, but they exist in the form of living costs, not fees.
I've worked in unis since I was 19 and all I can say is there ain't many working class kids there, in my experience.
I was lucky - I went when you got a grant. My dad was a milkman and mum worked in an industrial kitchen so I'm pretty sure that, if the current regulations were in place, we'd have sat down at the time and concluded that it was too much of a debt to take on and I've have had to pursue something else. Dunno where I'd be right now without that commitment to universal education.
Frankly, I'm completely aghast that I'm having to even justify my views on this thread. I'd have thought it was obvious - tuition fees discriminate against the poor.
I was lucky - I went when you got a grant. My dad was a milkman and mum worked in an industrial kitchen so I'm pretty sure that, if the current regulations were in place, we'd have sat down at the time and concluded that it was too much of a debt to take on and I've have had to pursue something else. Dunno where I'd be right now without that commitment to universal education.
Frankly, I'm completely aghast that I'm having to even justify my views on this thread. I'd have thought it was obvious - tuition fees discriminate against the poor.
I was lucky - I went when you got a grant. My dad was a milkman and mum worked in an industrial kitchen so I'm pretty sure that, if the current regulations were in place, we'd have sat down at the time and concluded that it was too much of a debt to take on and I've have had to pursue something else. Dunno where I'd be right now without that commitment to universal education.
Frankly, I'm completely aghast that I'm having to even justify my views on this thread. I'd have thought it was obvious - tuition fees discriminate against the poor.
This system doesn't really mate. I mean, I'm a nice leftie most of the time, Labour supporter at the forthcoming election, and a student.
HOWEVER, the tuition fee system is mostly well thought through, although I have several criticisms, but first:
The system actually benefits those of us from a poorer background, because those from a better off background get less in terms of grants and loans. It is not enough to live on, and if your parents do not support you - for whatever reason - you are stuck.
- Coming to university has cost me £0 upfront
- The loans and grants I get, coming from a poorer background, are enough to live on
- I do not have to pay anything until I'm earning at the threshold - and on the threshold you're talking about £30 per month, after £21k or whatever it is
- There is just no way I could be priced out, or my family, there is no debt burden unless you are earning decent money.
Other criticisms are that:
There is just no way you could be priced out of uni because of a low family income at present.
- While there will be no trouble repaying it, £9k is not value for money on every course
- The state will ultimately lose money when so few pay it back in its entirety.
Good post mate.
This is what it's all about, being able to fairly critique the policies of every party.
The Lib Dems played a blinder in that even though they were forced to go along with raising the fees the system that was eventually introduced is great for the poorest and only costs more if you end up getting a really high paying job.
The LD's took a hard time over this one - although yeah, fair enough, they broke a vow, but it is a fairly good system. Faults need ironing out like.
It's a brilliant system from my point of view, just the one major criticism - my girlfriend struggles because her parents are in the highest income band, however they have seven children, three at university, and cannot just top up her income. The system does not take that into account! She will amass personal debt while she is at university and that is an issue.
Her dad shouldn't have been such a sex god ffs...
Sex god, he is not.
Fundamentalist Christian, he is.
Does do my head in when you see the LD's absolutely battered for this, repeatedly.
You seem happy to take the route which is impossible for the impoverished. You are leaving many fellow countrymen behind to struggle with the journey whilst the state assist those who were already finding the journey a breeze.I've never moved to the right. I have strong social feelings and beliefs towards helping those who are not as fortunate and they have never changed, but we differ on how that can be achieved.........for me the destination is the same, merely the route taken may differ........
But hasn't the number of people going increased?
The answer to this is a few pages back. The number of people going has increased because the universities have made more places available. The number of people applying has decreased markedly.
The gap between the numbers of rich and poor students applying to university has narrowed, with disadvantaged teenagers more likely than ever before to want to enrol.
New figures, published by admissions service Ucas, show that the application rates of 18-year-olds living in poor areas in all four countries of the UK have increased to the highest levels recorded.
Overall, there was a 2% increase in applications, compared to the same point last year, with 592,290 people applying.
Among UK applicants, there was a 1% rise, according to Ucas. In England alone, the number applying was also up 1%.