I was thinking about Thatcher and Socialism the other day - when you actually look at what she said, often it made sense. What didn't make sense was the implementation of what she wanted.
For example, she believed that everyone was essentially unequal - that they shouldn't be dropped in a box at birth and recorded as a number in the system, that they could do whatever they wanted and make the system their master, rather than owner.
That sounds great - except when you see the consequences. Yes, some people did take advantage of that, but there's only a limited amount of opportunity in any country, and those that didn't get that opportunity were absolutely crushed; and unfortunately the Tories felt that was a price worth paying and to this very day completely turn a blind eye to the destruction the Thatcher regime wrought on this country.
That's why I don't understands extremes of both political spectrum ends. The right believe in free enterprise and basically the "self made man" - with not a care for those who don't adapt; like a "survival of the fittest" type of thing. Whereas the left believe money makes you automatically evil; constantly suspicious of anyone who does well, with the suspicion that they cheated and climbed over another man to get there.
That's why I've voted Labour this year - I think they're far enough to the left to stay to their ideals, but I just get the vibe that it's not the "Red Ed" socialism that I feared, and there's an understanding the City needs to grow to keep the top end of the economy flowing, every bit as much as the small businesses up and down the country - WITHOUT leaving people in the gutter wherever possible.
TLDR