Cricket, darts, golf, snooker and F1, most pointless "sports" in the entire world.Would watch it over this drivel. Only F1 falls below cricket for sports I’d rather nail my plums to the wall than watch.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cricket, darts, golf, snooker and F1, most pointless "sports" in the entire world.Would watch it over this drivel. Only F1 falls below cricket for sports I’d rather nail my plums to the wall than watch.
You forgot golf.Cricket, darts, snooker and F1, most pointless "sports" in the entire world.
I did.You forgot golf.
And rowing.You forgot golf.
And cycling.And rowing.
I don't believe, based in the cricket played to date that they are the better team. Sure the score is 2-1 but for anyone who has watched the 4 matches that scoreline is perverseDont get why the Aussies in here are getting all "Whinging Poms" about this.
The overwhelming attitude over here is that it was just a massive shame that a fabulous series was ruined. If they had managed to play, Aussie could have played stoically, set England a target, and bowled us out. Or we could have had a nail biting decider at The Oval. Both are way better than what happened. But, that is cricket.
Well played Aussie, clearly the best side retained the urn. Ish, but we will never know.
Rugby Union - consists of 30 people barging into each other, then somebody drops the ball. Somebody kicks it and the barging starts again. Then 15 substitutes come on - the end.And cycling.
I don't believe, based in the cricket played to date that they are the better team. Sure the score is 2-1 but for anyone who has watched the 4 matches that scoreline is perverse
Sort of, there's been a multitude of big moments in each match, that entire first innings by the aus at OT was peculiar, and the sheer volume of mistakes made by both sides. Some very borderline calls been made also. lyon's injury to. There's been worse tempered ashes previous also.I don't believe, based in the cricket played to date that they are the better team. Sure the score is 2-1 but for anyone who has watched the 4 matches that scoreline is perverse
And cycling.
I'd counter Lyon's injury with injuries to Archer , Stone and Leach.Sort of, there's been a multitude of big moments in each match, that entire first innings by the aus at OT was peculiar, and the sheer volume of mistakes made by both sides. Some very borderline calls been made also. lyon's injury to. There's been worse tempered ashes previous also.
I'd counter Lyon's injury with injuries to Archer , Stone and Leach.
To some extent England were the authors of their own misfortune by picking Bairstow ahead of Foakes but on the balance of play I think that most fair minded observers would say that England have been the better team.
I'd counter Lyon's injury with injuries to Archer , Stone and Leach.
To some extent England were the authors of their own misfortune by picking Bairstow ahead of Foakes but on the balance of play I think that most fair minded observers would say that England have been the better team.
As well as authors of their own downfall, with each toss won, batting not long enough, then batting to long, then chancing the weather, there's no mean streak in them, its a nasty mentality side - which is why so much has been made of entertaining england, saving test cricket, and words in the lords chamber.I'd counter Lyon's injury with injuries to Archer , Stone and Leach.
To some extent England were the authors of their own misfortune by picking Bairstow ahead of Foakes but on the balance of play I think that most fair minded observers would say that England have been the better team.