Whistlin' Dixie
Player Valuation: £50m
Anyone with half a brain must realise we're better off in than out, won't they ?
There are emotional, Little Britain, reasons for wanting out, and I can understand people getting caught up in that, but I'd hope that anyone with a smidgeon of intelligence would recognise the benefits of being in the EU.
The clincher for me is that Boris Johnson wants us out. Boris is highly intelligent but also a fool. If he becomes leader of the Tories he's our best chance of a Labour party under Corbyn winning the next election ( which would be ace )
However, if Boris says Out is good, then I'm defo in the Remain camp.
I'm no fan of Johnson's, dummkopf-schmitt's, grayling's, farage's et al. I'm not voting 'out' for, or because of them - I'm voting for what I believe's best for the nation. It just so happens that I agree with the basic principles of the campaign.
Gidiot osborne says "remain"...A 7 year old kid has stumped that toff moron. He can't even get figures right for the next three months, and has done more u-turns than a driving instructor does throughout a 40 year career.
And then there's camoron...As I've said previously - It's hobson's choice, but a choice that has to be made.
It's right to be cynical about the promoters of both sides of the argument, but at least be balanced about it and promote your side of the argument, rather than questioning the lack of intelligence of the electorate and labelling them 'little englanders'.
There was a time we weren't in the EU (Or EEC as was) and were doing rather well trading with the rest of the planet. We joined a common market, we didn't join a federal superstate. We weren't asked if we wanted laws imposed on us; it was never meant to be part of what we originally agreed on/ voted for.
The EU commission is currently trying to negotiate exemption from TTIP for health provision.
This disagrees...Along with several other instances/reports could show you.
http://www.patients4nhs.org.uk/eu-us-free-trade-agreement-or-ttip/
- The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) currently being negotiated between the EU and the US (for more details, see below).
- Overall, FTAs involve irreversible commitments made at a level of international trade law that trumps national law: once signed, it is almost impossible for a national government to cancel an FTA, or withdraw some of the commitments made. In other words, FTAs give far-reaching rights to transnational corporations while severely undermining the power of democratically elected governments and our national sovereignty.
And do you really think we won't end up with a potentially worse version of TTIP outside the EU, seeing as the Tories have been advocates for much of the worst of it?
If you'd read my earlier posts you'll have noticed I said that TTIP will render the privatisation process irreversible and we wouldn't have any power to stop it, whereas a tory govt OUTSIDE the EU would face stiff opposition if they tried to do what TTIP would do.
Yes, they've privatised piecemeal up to now, but to do it wholesale like (TTIP'd make it) would see them out on their arses almost immediately.
They'd be facing strike after strike across all sectors and would no doubt be booted out at the next election. We can't boot the EU commissioners out unless we vote out in the referendum